This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 5; copies are available print on demand through Amazon here, and I offer an ebook version in pdf format at the Legendary Lead Company here.
If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.
There was another chapter in the Swanberg story though . . . one which has a connection to Charles Keeran, inventor of the Eversharp.
Keeran’s activities in connection with the Eversharp are well documented (see “Wahl, Sheaffer and the Race for Boston,” beginning at https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2016/12/wahl-sheaffer-and-race-for-boston-part.html). However, Keeran’s activities after he was ousted from Wahl in 1917 are still murky; he was a founding member of Realite, and also had involvement with Autopoint – two firms which merged (the surviving company was named Autopoint Products Co.) and, like Wahl, found themselves at odds with the intense Charles Keeran. I’m not yet sure what happened between Keeran and Autopoint, but he wound up suing the company for patent infringement in 1922; whether he was still associated with the company by that point, I don’t know, but if he was the relationship must have been strained:
After Autopoint, I’ve documented what little I’ve been able to find out about Keeran, from his involvement with other Chicago firms, such as Keen-Point and Dur-O-Lite (https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2013/03/keen-eye-for-keen-points.html) and Rite-Rite (https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2015/01/silent-witness.html).
He also came into contact with Julius Swanberg and Robert Chelton. In 1924, Swanberg had filed a patent application for a screw drive pencil, which was issued as number 1,629,766 on May 24, 1927 and was assigned to Chelton:
On February 14, 1927, Charles Keeran and Robert Chelton filed an application for another screw-drive pencil, which was issued on September 2, 1930 as number 1,774,699. It is one of the very few of Keeran’s numerous patents in which he had a co-inventor:
When I had the opportunity to pick up much of the late Jim Ryan’s collection of pencils last November, I jumped at the chance. Jim was a Chicago collector, so he had acquired a substantial number of Swanberg’s more sophisticated offerings:
That salmon-colored pencil really pops, and the top closely resembles Swanberg’s 1924 patent application:
The crown top pencils at the top have a commanding presence. They are marked “Swanberg / Made In U.S.A. Under The / Keeran-Chelton Pend. Pats.”
The more humble pencils at the bottom have the same imprint:
This advertisement, from the April 19, 1925 edition of the Waco News-Tribune (ad space must have been really cheap in Texas), shows four different models in the Swanberg lineup: the Tubit, the Number 7 (also in aluminum), and Numbers 5 and 11 ... and no pictures to assist with identification. The number 5, though, was a checking pencils while the number 11 was “the most perfect and beautiful pencil ever offered.”
The good folks over at Madeinchicagomuseum.com have put a pretty good dent into filling in the details of the Swanberg story (see https://www.madeinchicagomuseum.com/single-post/swanberg-mfg-co). They even found my Shur-Rite articles and called them a “gallant attempt” to discover what happened to the company, and they posted a couple pictures of Julius Swanberg himself:
1 comment:
Thank you for writing about Julius Swanberg and his role in the mechanical pencil design. My Great Aunt gave me her writing set which has a Lady Parker Duofold Lucky Curve in it but didn’t have a Parker pencil with it. It ended up she preferred the Swanberg Tubit aluminum pencil as she was also from Chicago. I had the hardest time trying to figure out where this pencil came from as it only has TUBIT USA Patent pending on it. No Swanberg or anything else. Because of your article, I was able to get to the Chicago museum and discover the story of this pencil. It seems I have one of few pencils that actually of TUBIT written on it. Do you know if this is the case? I have this set for sale but if it is that rare, I feel maybe I should donate it the Chicago Museum. She would have liked that a lot and I would do so in her name but need confirmation and would like to do so before approaching the museum so I don’t look ridiculous. chasingmydream is my username at Yahoo.com
Post a Comment