Showing posts with label Seth Crocker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Seth Crocker. Show all posts

Thursday, November 20, 2025

The Friendly Reminder

Many of the pictures in my “to be written about” folder were taken so long ago, and they have spent so much time living rent-free in my head, that I’m sure that I had already written about them . . . so sure that when one of Gabriel’s care packages had a Seth Crocker pencil in it, I was convinced I would be updating a previous article and picking up where I left off.


I was absent longer than expected to write the Sheaffer and Eversharp books, and a few years later, I had circled back around to find good and bad news. Bad news first: Gabriel’s example of the Seth Crocker is a duplicate of an example I have: it’s a black two-band example, just like the one at top here:


No worries about that, though – should a Seth Crocker limp into the museum in a really wild color but missing a thing or two, it will be good to have one that can share custody of its bits and pieces. As I compared it to what was in my photo archive, I stumble across some pictures of another one, which David Nishimura had brought to the Baltimore show several years ago.


The good news was that Gabriel’s example nudged me to take a few do-over shots of this one; what was in my head never made it onto paper because the photos I shot did not turn out as well as I hoped, and with those updated pictures I can push this one across the finish line. The clip on this one is marked “Sears” rather than the usual Seth Crocker:


I believe “Sears” is a reference to Seth Chilton Crocker’s father, Seth Sears Crocker, owner of the original Crocker Pen Company – a happy coincidence that likely didn’t sit well with Sears, Roebuck & Co. See “It Isn’t a Race, But If It Were . . .” (June 14, 2020: Volume 6, page 185). Joe Nemecek has a Sears-marked Seth Crocker, shown on page 187, but his has the typical three narrow trim bands. This Sears has a little something extra:



Despite the deluxe trim, there’s no imprint on the barrel, but removing the nose reveals that it has the same mechanism inside.



The Seth Crocker pencil was designed by Ambrose Fleming: his patent 1,886,333 was applied for on May 12, 1931 and was issued November 1, 1932; see “The Patent Book Passes a Harsh Test (November 4, 2014: Volume 3, page 84):


Page one of the drawings isn’t particularly helpful, but there’s a couple figures on page two of the specifications which clearly show the Seth Crocker’s unique internal lead tray.


At that same Baltimore Show, George Rimakis tracked me down with a little pile of goodies he’d set aside for me, including these two:


At the time, I had recently written about the “Pencil Knife” in “What They Looked Like and Why Most Don’t” (May 30, 2021), and I thought these might be a little less “knifey” version, with that distinctive lower trim band.


Alas, there isn’t enough there to connect the two - the placement of the trim band is all that the two have in common. On the Pencil Knife, that’s just the joint where the top pulls off, and it has a conventional nose-drive mechanism. George’s pencils, however, have tips that unscrew to reveal something far less conventional.


Hmm . . . a nose that unscrews to reveal a weird mechanism . . . 



On a hunch, I browsed American Writing Instrument Patents Volume 2: 1911-1945 to see if Ambrose Fleming designed any other pencils. He’s credited with nine inventions in the book for patents issued between 1921 and 1932, with the Seth Crocker pencil being the last of them. One of his earlier inventions was patent 1,674,357, applied for on March 22, 1926 and issued on June 19, 1928.


That’s it.

There’s no markings on George’s pencils - no branding and no “Pat. Pend.” or other information. In 1928, when Fleming’s earlier patent was issued, the Crocker/Chilton saga was at a transition point: the Crocker Pen Manufacturing Company (in its later years, under the direction of the colorful George Zain) had failed in 1926. The Chilton Pen Company was formed in 1926 by Seth Chilton Crocker; his father Seth Sears Crocker died in 1927.  Seth Chilton Crocker was then given the boot from Chilton in 1932, at which time he formed the Seth Crocker Pen Company. See “Three Missing Years” (June 15, 2020: Volume 6, page 187).

That is a lot going on in a few short years. This story continues to inch forward one step at a time, and now I would like to learn more about our man Ambrose Fleming: no, I don’t think he’s the same guy as John Ambrose Fleming, the English inventor, and I don’t know what if any relationship our Ambrose had to Seth Chilton Crocker, Chilton, or the Seth Crocker Pen Company. 

Are George’s pencils “Seth Crocker” pencils? It’s possible, but I don’t think so, because they are not so marked. Maybe he was an independent inventor who sold his last invention to Seth Crocker, and maybe there is more to be learned about the story.

Sunday, June 14, 2020

It Isn't a Race, But If It Was . . .

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

For several years, Joe and I have sparred over who has more varieties of Chilton pencils, and while I think Joe has pulled out in front of me, there was a time when I gave him a run for his money (the article I posted here on March 16, 2013 was titled “Neck and Neck” - see The Leadhead’s Pencil Blog Volume 2, page 97).

That doesn’t mean I haven’t found some Chiltons that are worthy of note to show you, though:


This one came my way via Loyal Knight Don Haupt at the 2019 Baltimore Show.  It’s the only one I’ve seen in the box like this, and also the only one I’ve seen in that wild, wild color:


Not to mention the silver rather than gold filled trim - I’m not going to call it “reverse trim,” since I haven’t seen any other examples in that color plastic to know what it was or wasn’t “supposed to” have.  But as for that top - that flared shape is nicknamed a “Boston” top by Chilton collectors, and should denote somewhat earlier production, before the company moved to Long Island City, New York.

Just a few weeks ago on April 27 (https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2020/04/the-chilton-article-i-meant-to-write.html), I explained that there wasn’t a bright line to separate flared “Boston” caps and bulbous “Long Island” caps on the day of the company’s big move.  According to advertisements, Chilton moved to New York between June and October, 1929, and the first advertisement which shows the new colors being offered by the company (and which appears to show that flared cap on a pen) was from September, 1930.

Not that the company didn’t use up some leftover parts even later, though:


“L.I.R.R. VETS 1931.” While there’s any number of ways to read the first part of the inscription (I get a commemorative event for former employees of the Long Island Railroad), the last bit makes it clear that Boston caps were used on Chilton products – at least some of them – as late as 1931.

And on different note, a couple online auctions brought a pair of black Seth Crocker Repeating Pencils to my doorstep to go with the burgundy example I wrote about back in 2014 (see “The Patent Book Passes a Harsh Test” in The Leadhead’s Pencil Blog Vol. 3 at page 84).


The first one to come up for bids was the one with the two bands - no sooner had it closed then the seller listed the one with three bands, and the OCD completest in me had to give chase, knowing the underbidder from the first go-round was likely to be even more determined.  I paid more than I wanted to, but I was glad I did when it arrived and I learned that the extra band might have denoted a larger size . . .

Maybe . . .


That's Joe Nemecek's picture of his two examples.  Joe also has both sizes, but both have three bands.  However, there’s a slight difference here: Joe’s smaller one is marked “Sears” on the clip rather than “Seth Crocker.”  The name is likely a hat tip to Seth Chilton Crocker’s father, Seth Sears Crocker, rather than a riff on the mail order giant – although Sears, Roebuck & Co. as a seller of pens and pencils likely had a hand in swiftly putting a stop to Seth Chilton Crocker’s use of dad’s middle name on a line of writing instruments.

As the story goes, the Seth Crocker Pen Company was set up by Seth Chilton Crocker after he got the boot from his fellow shareholders in Chilton, in 1932.  While I didn’t find any advertisements or announcements of the company’s formation, the patent for the Seth Crocker Repeating Pencil was applied for in 1932, and the company was dissolved by the State of Massachusetts effective March 29, 1938, suggesting it had become inactive well before that date.

The Seth Crocker Pen Company and the Crocker Pen Company are the bookends on either side of the Chilton story, at the later and earlier ends of the company’s history.  I planned to start this article with something from that other, earlier bookend, but as the story developed, there was more to it than I typically put in these “Lazy Sunday” posts.   That full story tomorrow . . .

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

The Patent Book Passes a Harsh Test

My friend in California, who parted with the grey Parker Zaner-Bloser from yesterday’s article, had a few other things that he was interested in selling. Here’s one of them:


Great minds run in the same very small circles – I had bid on this item in an online auction probably five years earlier, not knowing anything about "Seth Crocker" but just because I liked the name . . .

To learn more, this full article is included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 3, available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble and everywhere else you buy books, or you can order a copy signed by yours truly through the Legendary Lead Company HERE.