Showing posts with label Hicks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hicks. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 25, 2025

This Marvelous Human Endeavor

Nearly everything I acquire these days is brought to me by friends at pen shows or comes from someone who has stumbled across this blog and emailed me. When I am out on the prowl at antique shows and malls, I rarely find anything that interests me; it sometimes seems like we are reaching a singularity in which all the pens and pencils are already in the hands of collectors. 

Imagine my elation when Janet and I walked into an antique mall we had not visited for some time in September, and the first showcase inside the door looked like this:


I asked the person working the desk to let me have a look – might as well bring the whole box up to the counter, I told her, because this might take a while. Most of it wasn’t worth buying, but there were a few things that were reasonably priced. I still probably overpaid, but it’s hard to maintain interest in the thrill of the chase if you never catch anything.


The top one is another of those Hicks snail-patterned pencils; nothing to write home about, but it’s clean and people like these at pen shows. The next two items in this little haul are a pair of Tiffany ballpoints. They aren’t the prettiest – that’s Exhibit A for the premise that Tiffany-marked stuff is like Ohio State memorabilia (put that name on a dried out dog turd and they would sell like hotcakes). Still . . . the two patterns were nice to buy together, and they aren’t bad additions to the Tiffany section at the museum, which now also includes a Tiffany magic pencil that came from Rob Bader’s Victorian haul.



The next one, in floral-engraved sterling, has a hallmark near the nose - an F in a shield. That denotes Fairchild & Co., the last incarnation of the firm founded by Leroy Fairchild, as carried on by his son Harry from 1905 until 1927 (see “Three of a Kind . . . Maybe Four” on March 23, 2018: Volume 5, page 199). You don’t see those often, especially in the wild, and I didn’t have one like it. 

Next is something I don’t normally chase; it’s unmarked, but I just liked it. The three colored buttons on top indicate the lead colors in the three pencils nested inside.



That had me going back through the Victorian haul from Rob Bader looking for something I thought wound up in my pile, and it did. Rob’s is also unmarked, which is why it wound up in inventory rather than the museum . . . 


Two’s a coincidence and three’s a collection, as Janet always says. Dammit, there’s no point putting these back in inventory, because I know myself . . . when the next one comes along, I know I’ll bite and I’ll drive myself crazy trying to find these two again. They now reside in the “unmarked but worthy” wing at the museum, with a space next to them for the day I know will eventually come.

That blue plastic fountain pen with what looks like a modern plastic clip is much older and better than it looks: it’s a “Graphomatic,” made by the Sager Barrel O’ Ink guys. I have wanted an example of my own since Richard Binder allowed me to use an image of one in his collection in a piece I wrote about a Graphomatic double-ended pencil – see “A Name Closer to Right” (April 15, 2020: Volume 6, page 48).  



Then there’s that Eversharp lookalike at bottom - it’s actually a Shur-Rite, and even though it’s really clean, I’ve got a couple others just like it at home.


I had to have it anyway, even though it was a bit overpriced, because of what was on the top: “Awarded by L.C. Smith & Bros. Typw. Co.,” it reads.

With my little pile of goodies waiting in my bin at the checkout counter, Janet and I explored the rest of the mall and I found . . . absolutely nothing. The thrill of the chase was losing all of its thrill as we trudged along, and I began to have an existential moment wondering what the heck I’m doing. I’ve chased these things for more than twenty five years now, and I’ve got more of them than I’ll ever have time to write about, much less use – even if I wrote one word with each one for my next book.

Maybe that’s an exaggeration. I write a lot.

Whenever I have these thoughts, it makes me remember something I first heard in 1995 that has dogged me ever since. That was when I first watched what I consider to be the finest hour of television that ever aired: it was an episode of The X-Files titled “Clyde Bruckman’s Final Repose” - season three, episode four for those of you who track that sort of thing.

Peter Boyle (best remembered as Ray Romano’s dad in Everybody Loves Raymond) guest starred as Clyde Bruckman, an insurance salesman with a unique but very limited gift: he knew how and when any particular person would die.

As Mulder and Scully investigated the murders of several fortune tellers, Mulder tried to tap Bruckman’s gifts by taking him to the scene of the latest crime. There, standing in the midst of the victim’s extensive collection of dolls, Mulder asks Bruckman if he had any insights into what motivated the killer. Bruckman’s response has haunted me.

“Why does anyone do the things they do?” Bruckman replies. “Why do I sell insurance? I wish I knew. Why did this woman collect dolls? What was it about her life? Was it one specific moment where she suddenly said, ‘I know... dolls.’ Or was it a whole series of things? Starting when her parents first met that somehow combined in such a way that in the end, she had no choice but to be a doll colle...” 

With that, Bruckman has a vision, and he trails off mid-sentence.

I reached the end of that aisle in the antique mall as I thought once again about Clyde Bruckman’s words, musing as I have done countless times why I was doing what I was doing. This time, the tumblers of the universe aligned at that precise moment; I rounded the corner, and I found something.

It wasn’t a pencil. It was my explanation.

There, laying in the center of an antique table, was a coffee table book titled The Baseball Companion. It was opened to display what was written inside the front cover: 


“Scott - 

“Since I can’t always be your ‘companion,’ maybe this book can substitute and remind you of the good times we had playing catch in the backyard . . . . . and how that helped you go on to be a champion with the A’s (and with everything else that you have accomplished)!

Love,

Dad 

8/3/95

“P.S. Remember, God will be your “companion” always, and will keep you a champion -”

With that, just like Clyde Bruckman also did in 1995, “Dad” trails off . . . leaving me standing there thirty years later, in the middle of an antique mall trying to hold back the tears.

That’s it. That’s always been it.

Whether or not I have always known it, my fascination with writing tools and with writing about those tools has been a celebration of the miracle that is the act of writing itself. “Scott’s” father dragged a stick with a bit of ink in it across a piece of paper thirty years ago, and the shapes he made with that stick planted forceful and visceral emotions into my head that remain every bit as powerful today.

Writing is powerful. Whether it’s a pen, or a pencil, or an old typewriter, or a laptop – the tool doesn’t matter, but the raw and awe-inspiring capabilities these things have in the hands of the humans who wield them does. Sometimes that power is used for good, and sometimes it is used for evil. Nearly always, what is good or evil is mostly a matter of perspective.

We are born, we tamp down the earth beneath our feet as we walk around this little round rock for a while, and then we are gone. To paraphrase comedian Randy Feltface in “Randy Writes a Novel” (another hour well worth spending), life is just that insignificant hyphen in between birth and death. We leave no trace of what we thought, who we loved, or who we didn’t. For better or for worse, all of that ends when we do.

Unless we write.

I write books about pencils, tools that by themselves are of no real consequence. When I write an article, there’s something more to it than the pencil itself, and thanks to Scott’s father I can finally articulate why. Telling you these stories connects me with you – and your children, and your children’s children – in a way that nothing else in life can do. Every anecdote that is preserved passes on human thoughts and emotions from which future generations may benefit and learn in some small way. 

It doesn’t matter whether you agree with me or whether the words I write please you, anger you, enlighten you, or bewilder you. It is a marvelous human endeavor that I can press buttons on a machine and no matter the distance, no matter the decade – you feel something.

I didn’t buy that copy of The Baseball Companion, as much as I wanted to bring it home. To extrapolate on Clyde Bruckman, imagine all of the things that had to occur for that instant to happen, at exactly the right time. Whether by design or by an incredible series of coincidences, I was given this amazing gift and I do not believe that gift was only for me. I left that book right where it was in the hopes that others would see it and would be as moved as I was – surprised by the unexpected emotions welling up inside them as they experience an inexplicable and intimate connection with a person they have never met. Maybe that in turn would provide them with a greater appreciation for the connections they have with those in their own lives. 

Maybe they will go home, pick up the phone, and call their own fathers - or their children, or whoever else is important to them.

Maybe now that I’ve told you this story, you will, too. 

Friday, November 21, 2025

More Fine Snails

The “snail” pattern is ubiquitous among Victorian makers; in “In the Company of Fine Snails” (February 15, 2018: Volume 5, page 152), I presented desk pencils with that sort of treatment made by Mabie Todd, Hicks, and Fairchild & Johnson. There were a few snails in that recent collection I recently purchased from Rob Bader, too.

The example at top is an ordinary magic pencil made by W.S. Hicks – nothing extraordinary, but very clean. It bears that acorn mark I have theorized indicated it was made by the Hicks firm for wholesale to retailers.


The second pencil down is also made by Hicks, but it has an interesting “twist.” 


The nose is fixed in position. The back can be pulled out as an extender, and twisting it advances and retracts the lead; the Eagle Pencil Company did something similar. Like the first one, this one also bears the Hicks acorn:


The next pencil down advances into position by twisting the back half of the barrel; this is the pencil part of John Mabie’s ubiquitous patent 11,762 issued on October 3, 1854, but without the nib slider found on Mabie Todd patented combination pens and pencils. It’s a chunky hunk o’ sterling, but the reason I wanted to keep it in the collection is because it bears a mark I don’t see very often:



In “Two Hallmarks, Two Connections” (June 29, 2021: Volume 7, page 227), I showed another pencil with a similar mark, which was picked up in the 1904 edition of Trade-Marks of the Jewelry and Kindred Trades as a state-protected mark by Ephraim S. Johnson & Co.


Whenever I find that sideways J in a diamond, it is flanked by the numbers 925 and 1000, denoting sterling silver. Typically, that appears on pencils made for export to the European market, but their near universal presence on Johnson pencils suggests that Johnson was simply adding a bit of continental flair to his hallmark. 

This next item isn’t a pencil at all. It is an empty container with a threaded cap – its dimensions suggest that it might be a thermometer holder. I kept it because of the hallmark on both the cap and the barrel:



The Hutcheon Brothers mark isn’t surprising on a snail-patterned piece, since Mabie Todd was a prolific user of this pattern and Hutcheon was named for Alfred G. Hutcheon, who left Mabie Todd but retained an unusually close relationship with his former firm; see “House of Hutcheon” published October 15, 2025. 

The last example isn’t quite the same level of quality; the pattern is less refined, and a couple spots of wear reveal it is plated brass rather than sterling. Still, a desk pencil like this is quite the step up from its maker’s usual fare:


The Eagle Pencil Company was a pioneer in producing less expensive writing instruments that had the look of something more exclusive – a wolf in snail’s clothing in this case.

Friday, October 24, 2025

The Chicago Victorians

I found a few great Victorian pieces to add to the museum at the Chicago show this year. I know a few of these came from Mike Greaney, and it was great to catch up with him since I last saw him:


That top one is a convertible pencil - you can either keep it in the holder on a chain, or withdraw it:


The neat ribbed top had me thinking Edward Todd before I pulled out my loupe - but the Edward Todds I have along these lines are telescoping pencils that extend by friction as they are withdrawn:


The patent on the Edward Todd pieces is August 9, 1892; I wrote about these in “The Hicks Variation” (August 24, 2017: Volume 5, page 96).


The more I thought about that, the more I thought that wasn’t right. It wasn’t – I had the wrong Todd.


This one is marked Mabie, Todd & Co., and the patent date imprinted is March 10, 1891 – that’s number 447,879, issued to John C.W. Jeffreys and George Dickman of London, England and assigned to George W. Mabie. That patent got past me when I wrote American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910; it wasn’t filed in any of the usual patent categories for pens and pencils, but in Class 63, “Jewelry,” subclass 22, “Bar: Devices comprising means to be passed through a buttonhole to secure the chain to the clothing.”  See “Another Forgotten Corner at the Patent Office” (December 7, 2015: Volume 4, page 25).


Once I had the right maker in mind, it was easy finding that example I wrote about ten years ago, and another one with that same neat ribbed top.


This next one, if I remember right, came from Pete Kirby. It has a patent date I remembered:


I remembered having another one along these lines, too. Fortunately it was with a different pattern, and they do look very nice together:


And, I remembered the trick about these from the last time I wrote about them, in “Three Interesting Hicks Patents” (September 22, 2016: Volume 4, page 181). There’s something on the other end of that pencil, I thought . . . 


Well, there should be, anyway. The one I had in my collection is intact, with a nice John Holland No. 6 dip pen nib. The pencil part of the new addition works just fine, but the band that secured a dip pen nib has gone missing.

The next Victorian that came home from Chicago with me was this hard rubber example:


It is also a Hicks, but there isn’t a patent associated with this one.


What makes this one unusual is its large pencil mechanism, operated by a simple slider. By this time, in the 1870s or 1880s, the slider function was usually reserved for dip pen nibs, with pencils advanced by some sort of spiral or twist mechanism.


The fourth pencil in this group is another Mabie Todd, and with that fat front end where the nose comes out I knew exactly what it is:


The barrel imprint reads “Pat. Mar. 16, ‘75 / Mabie, Todd & Co. / 1664":


These have come up a couple times here over the years, in “Mabie’s Other Patent” (June 14, 2021: Volume 7, page 194) and “Something I Never Knew Was There” (November 30, 2016: Volume 4, page 276). The reference is to George Mabie’s patent number 160,924:


The nose pulls out of the barrel and reverses for the dip pen nib.


Usually these are much bigger than this example, which fits well with the ones that were pictured in David Moak’s book, Mabie in America. It’s in better shape than my other hard rubber example – and it’s in a different pattern, too.


The last of my Chicago finds will have to wait until tomorrow. As I poked around for more information about it, an amazing story emerged . . . and when I’m finished telling it, you are going to think I did this on purpose.

Saturday, October 11, 2025

Motor City Highlights

The stories behind how these bits and trinkets find their way to me are sometimes as much fun as exploring the history of the objects themselves. Unfortunately, during the time I was off fooling around writing the Sheaffer and Eversharp books, many of these back stories have faded from my memory.

Janet and I were at the Detroit Pen Show last weekend, and I found a few interesting things to show you. Rather than lining them up at the end of the long queue of stuff I need to photograph, I thought I’d tell you about them now, while my memory is fresh.

Detroit was better attended and busier this year than it has been in recent years. Janet and I had two tables, and on Friday show organizer Dale Penkala stopped by to ask me how business was. Great, I replied – I’m losing all kinds of money. 

Dale looked concerned until I told him it’s a great show when I lose money on Friday: that’s what happens when I am so busy flitting around the room, talking to people, and buying things for my collection that I’m not minding my shop. Saturday, I told him, is when I stay at my table and make all of that money back. Funny . . . I sell so much more when I’m sitting there.

I added all five of these to my collection that Friday.


Michael Krut was responsible for corrupting my pencil collection with those two half-pencil, half-pen combos at the top, but I was a willing co-conspirator. Both have those distinctive, turned-up ball clips that place them squarely in the Edward Todd / William S. Hicks family:


The gold filled example is marked for Edward Todd, both imprinted on the barrel and with a nice number 3 Edward Todd nib:



Although the sterling silver one has no imprint on the barrel, it does have a nib marked “W.S. Hicks Sons,” and I don’t have any reason to attribute it to any other maker:


The example at center came from Jerry Rosenthal, and it might have started life out as another combination pen and pencil before someone had a better idea for it.


Instead of a pencil, this has a really weird metal piece on the end, the parts of which don’t budge. With that  end removed, there’s nothing but an empty space inside:



I’m recalling the “Presso” toilet powder dispenser from “Marveling at Last in Person” (September 10, 2025), but there’s no movement with that end piece to suggest that it dispenses anything. Neither would there be any reason to store leads in a fountain pen. Perhaps it was a pill container or something.

There is a Hicks hallmark on the end of the cap, and the curled end of the clip instead of a ball is unusual but not unprecedented for a Hicks:



The nib, however, is a generic 14k nib. 


What had me puzzled was that there is no lever on the barrel, leaving me to wonder what this thing might be. Unscrewing the section provided that answer: it is a cheap bulb filler.


That pen and pencil set shown at bottom in that first image were also from Michael Krut. I had to give chase, because I’ve only seen one other pencil like this one.


I had a devil of a time finding that gold one - I knew I had taken pictures of it, but since these are so unlike anything else Hicks produced, I ended up shooting it alongside a few other random things I had purchased at the Baltimore Show a few years ago.


From top in this picture are a solid gold Mabie Todd:



A solid gold Hicks:


A vermiel (gold fill over sterling) pencil made by Louis Tamis & Son:


And this one, which was owned by Bob Johnson. It too is vermiel:


I’ll admit I didn’t shoot Bob’s pencil on its own because at the time, I thought it was kind of ugly but I felt compelled to buy it . . . the same sense of obligation I feel whenever I wind up buying a beautifully ugly Parker-Eversharp. I’ve softened on that a bit now, since it looks so nice alongside Michael Krut’s sterling silver set.


Both the pen and pencil bear Hicks hallmarks . . . 



The nib is a correct W.S. Hicks sons nib:


And just like the example I got from Jerry Rosenthal, there’s no lever on this pen, either. It has that same bulb-filler mechanism inside.