Showing posts with label Chase Pencil Corp.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chase Pencil Corp.. Show all posts

Thursday, August 14, 2025

That Last, Fascinating Reprise

Note: this third installment in a three-article series was published in the Spring 2025 issue of The PENnant, Journal of the Pen Collectors of America. The first installment is here.

When I attended the 2021 Chicago Show, I had in tow those three spectacular ‘Salrite pencils from the last installment of this series for ooooing and aaaaahing, and there were plenty of ooos and aaahs to be had. My antennae were up even more than usual for other examples of the ‘Salrite.

Rob Bader was also in attendance at the show, and as I pawed through the pile of things on his table Rob didn’t even know he had, he showed me a pencil he brought knowing I would jump all over it (Figure 1). I recognized it as a ‘Salrite, with James Salz’ patented mechanism and spare lead chamber (Figure 2), but the clip was an unmarked z-clip secured by a press-fitted trim band rather than the usual press-fit ‘Salrite clip – above which was a spectacular enameled emblem. The metal cap lacked the usual “Pencil Products Corporation” imprint, consistent with later examples of the ‘Salrite in my collection.

Figure 1. At top is a later ‘Salrite discussed in part one of this series, marked “Chase Pencil Corporation. Chase apparently took over production of the ‘Salrite between January and November 1924, and this was previously thought to be the final incarnation of the pencils. The example at bottom, acquired from Rob Bader at the 2021 Chicago Pen Show, clearly shares the same lines, but it is not marked ‘Salrite . . . and it adds one final chapter to the ‘Salrite story.

Figure 2. The new acquisition is clearly a ‘Salrite, complete with its patented mechanism and spare lead storage consisting of holes drilled around the barrel. The pencils are identical, other than the clip and the attractive enameled emblem above it.

Rob told me how much he wanted, and the deal was done as fast as I could whip the cash out of my pocket. I would have whipped that cash out even faster had I been examining it more closely with a loupe; back at my table, a closer examination of this new find revealed an imprint I had not yet seen: “Royal Pencil Corp. / Corona, N.Y.C.” (Figure 3).

Figure 3. ‘Salrite pencils are typically stamped “Pencil Products Corp.” and Lucifer Most’s patent date of December 23, 1919, and later models also include a reference to James Salz’ patent of May 2, 1922. This new example, however, is stamped only with the 1922 patent date followed by “Royal Pencil Corp. / Corona, N.Y.C.”

Recall from the first installment in this series of articles that the ‘Salrite’s demise began with an unfavorable decision by the Patent Office, which denied Salz registration of the name “Salzrite” in March, 1923 due to a likelihood of confusion with the Sandfelder Corporation’s “Shur-Rite” trademark.  The ‘Salrite was last offered for sale in January 1924, and by November a “Chase Pencil Corporation” had taken over production of the pencils.

I was fairly confident this Royal Pencil Corporation was not connected with the makers of those crappy, later third-tier pens and pencils marked “Royal,” and the reference to Corona, New York ruled out production across the pond (where “Royal Imperial” wood pencils were made for distribution in the United States). A “Royal Pencil Corporation” fit nowhere into my research, and this was the first time I couldn’t wait for a pen show to end, just so I could research Rob’s pencil as soon as I got home!

My research took only a few seconds, after a search for “Royal Pencil Corporation” turned up as its first result a 2007 blog post by New Zealander “Kiwi Dave” over at Dave’s Mechanical Pencils, who included low-resolution images of a Royal Pencil Corporation brochure in his article. Dave was kind enough to supply better quality images of the brochure, which includes Salz’ “Machine Gun of Commerce” catchphrase and also refers to the pencil as the ‘Salrite, even though the pencils are not so marked (Figure 4). There is an illustration of one pencil with a red hard rubber nose, begging the question of whether an all-red hard rubber pencil was made by or for Royal (Figure 5). 

Figure 4. It took only a few minutes for the author to find “Kiwi Dave’s” 2007 article about the Royal Pencil Corporation at his “Dave’s Mechanical Pencils” blog, which included a low-resolution image of this Royal Pencil brochure. Dave graciously supplied this higher resolution image of the brochure.

Figure 5. The back side of the brochure shows various models. Note the “Machine Gun of Commerce” catchphrase, which had been used by Salz to promote the ‘Salrite since 1921, and the text describes the pencils as the ‘SALRITE, even though the pencils themselves are not so marked. Note that the example at left has a red nose, presumably also made of hard rubber; as of this writing, no red ‘Salrite pencils have been found, and the possibility of finding an example like this or with a matching red barrel is tantalizing indeed!

Other details in the brochure fill in more of the story: note the Copyright date in the bottom corner is 1928 (Figure 6) – four years after the brief emergence of the Chase Pencil Corporation, and long after the Sandfelder Corporation’s “Shur-Rite” was out of production.

Figure 6. This brochure includes a copyright date of 1928, four years after the Chase Pencil Corporation had taken over production of the ‘Salrite. By that time, many manufacturers had discontinued the use of hard rubber in pencil barrels, making the Royal a last gasp for both the ‘Salrite and hard rubber pencils generally. 

There’s more. The front cover indicates the Royal Pencil was marketed – but not marked – as the “Lodge-I-Cal” pencil (it took me a minute to catch the play on the word “logical” – Figure 7). 

Figure 7. The “Lodge-I-Cal” trademark is shown in this portion of the brochure in Figure 5, with a pencil forming the letter I, is a play on “logical” and Royal’s business model of producing pencils with fraternal emblems. The “Reg. U.S. Pat. Off.” Legend sent the author back to read his own book, American Writing Instrument Trademarks 1870-1953, to see if a trademark was registered for the mark.

The “Reg. U.S. Pat. Off.” notation accompanying the mark signifies that the Royal Pencil Corporation at least claimed to have registered a United States trademark, and I happen to have written an excellent book on the subject: American Writing Instrument Trademarks 1870-1953. I flipped through my book, and there it was: William H. Watt, president of the Royal Pencil Corporation at 110-64 Corona Avenue, Corona, New York, applied for registration of the Lodge-I-Cal mark – complete with its stylized pencil in place of the letter I – on March 7, 1929.

Figure 8. In the author’s defense, the only documentation connecting the “Lodge-I-Cal” mark to the Royal Pencil Corporation was the image in Figure 4. William H. Watt, president of the Royal Pencil Corporation at 110-64 Corona Avenue, Corona, New York, applied for registration of the Lodge-I-Cal mark on March 7, 1929, claiming that the mark was first used in commerce on February 1, 1929. Registration was granted on December 10, 1929 as Trademark 264,864.

The Lodge-I-Cal mark was granted registration on December 10 1929 as Trademark 264,864 (Figure 8). The certificate states that Royal claimed first use of the mark in commerce on February 1, 1929; if that is true, Royal’s brochure was printed before the pencils themselves were produced. By 1929, most manufactures had discontinued the use of hard rubber in favor of brightly colored celluloid in the manufacture of writing instruments, making the Royal Lodge-I-Cal a last gasp for both the ‘Salrite and hard rubber pencils. 

Perhaps that is why it has taken me so long to find one – then again, without any identifying marks on the pencil other than “Royal Pencil Corp.,” perhaps I have been searching the online auctions in all the wrong places, since I haven’t actively searched for those lousy, third-tier “Royal” pencils.

But wait . . . there’s even more.

Note that every pencil in the brochure has an emblem affixed above the clip: “Lodge-I-Cal” referred to the Royal Pencil Company’s business model of producing pencils “furnished with emblem [sic] of all Secret, Civic, and Fraternal societies.” The pencils illustrated include fraternal emblems for the Knights of Columbus, the Elks, the Masons, and the Lions . . . plus a few others I don’t recognize. The emblem mounted on the example I acquired from Rob is incorporated into the border on the front page (Figures 9 and 10).

Figure 9. Detail of the enameled emblem on the Royal, with a mysterious “JrOUAM” designation. The compass and square strongly suggests a Masonic connection.

Figure 10. The JrOUAM emblem is incorporated into the border of the Royal brochure in Figure 4.

The compass and square incorporated into the emblem evoke a Masonic connection, although the meaning of the “JrOUAM” legend and arm-and-hammer in the middle eluded me. My friend John Hall is no longer with us to drive up in his miniature Tin Lizzy and tell me what this means, but fortunately he isn’t the only Mason I know: Bruce Mindrup, who was also in attendance at that Chicago show, took one look at Rob’s pencil and recognized the insignia . . . almost.

“I’ve seen this,” Bruce said several times, racking his brain for where and when. “I think I have a badge at home with this on it.” He puzzled for the remainder of the weekend until his puzzler was sore, and I felt guilty knowing that he wouldn’t rest until he remembered what it meant. I felt even more guilty when I received a letter from Bruce more than a month later: he still hadn’t found the badge, but he did find something that at least partly scratched the cranial itch I had given him. A Masonic meeting hall in Greenport, Long Island has a sign mounted on the outside, with this same logo indicating that “JrOUAM” stands for the “Junior Order United American Mechanics” fraternal organization (Figure 11). 

Figure 11. The author asked Bruce Mindrup, an active Mason who was in attendance at the show, what “JrOUAM” meant. Mindrup had seen it, but he couldn’t remember where. A month after the show, the author received this letter from him: a sign on the outside of a Masonic meeting hall in Greenport, Long Island indicates that “JrOUAM” stands for the Junior Order United American Mechanics.

The JrOUAM was founded in Germantown, Pennsylvania (near Philadelphia) on May 17, 1853, and unfortunately, the organization has an ugly past. Among its stated objectives, according to the History of the Junior Order United American Mechanics (1897), was nativist xenophobia: “to use such means, when able, as will prevent the current system of emigration of foreign paupers to our land” (page 19). Wikipedia suggests something even darker, that the organization was founded as an overtly anti-Catholic order. 

While there is no reference to “Catholic” in the 1897 history, the Wikipedia article notes that membership in the JrOUAM remains restricted to Protestants to this day. Its numbers have dwindled, but it continues to maintain a website at which only virtue, liberty, and patriotism are identified as the “principles of the order.” No publicly available source documents any formal relationship between the JrOUAM and the Masons, but the compass and square incorporated into its logo and its presence on the side of Masonic meeting hall suggests at least collaboration, if the JrOUAM has not been fully absorbed.

According to the Mason’s website, “Freemasonry is not concerned with theological distinctions or particular religious beliefs,” but the order requires its members to “believe in the existence of a Supreme Being.” 

The Catholic Church objects to the Masons’ noncommittal views as to what particular flavor of “Supreme Being” its members attorn, and beginning in 1738 Catholics were forbidden from joining the Masons under pain of excommunication. Pope John Paul II removed the penalty of excommunication in 1983, but reiterated the Church’s ban on joining the order.

Times change, and perspectives change with them. As for me . . . I simply prefer to enjoy a neat pencil with a great story to tell.

Saturday, September 10, 2016

'Salrite Update

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 4; copies are available print on demand through Amazon here, and I offer an ebook version in pdf format at the Legendary Lead Company here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

Coincidences seem to follow me around as I write these articles.  A few weeks ago my west coast connection Michael McNeil (Northwest Pen Works) sent me a couple pictures of pen trays to look at.  Here’s the picture he sent me:


That pencil on the far left is another example of the ‘Salrite; since I’ve got a few full sized ones like that, I almost passed on it, except there was what appeared to be a bit of decorative scrollwork around the cap unlike the plain raised rib I would expect to see.  So I bit.

There was more to the story.

Since Michael’s picture was taken at an angle from the nose end, I couldn’t see a couple other interesting things about this one.  The pencil arrived the very day part 2 of the ‘Salrite saga posted here (http://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2016/09/before-salz-was-salz-part-ii.html), and of course it changes a few things I wrote.  Here is a shot of Michael's pencil from a better angle:


Yes, it has the decorative scrollwork like the gold-filled example I posted about a couple days ago (see http://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2016/09/before-salz-was-salz-part-iii.html), but it’s rendered in the same nickel-plated trim found on the other black hard rubber examples – but with an exposed eraser, a feature I’ve never seen on a ‘Salrite:


But wait, as Billy Mays would say . . . there’s more.  That’s not the most interesting part about that cap:


In “Before Salz Was Salz Part 1" (http://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2016/09/before-salz-was-salz-part-i.html) I indicated that Lucifer Most was awarded two patents for the pencil – the patent date usually found on  metal Sta-Sharp and ‘Salrite pencils is December 23, 1919, but an earlier patent application Most filed was not awarded until June 20, 1922.

In “Before Salz Was Salz Part 2" (http://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2016/09/before-salz-was-salz-part-ii.html) I noted that the hard rubber ‘Salrites are marked on the cap with the December 23, 1919 date, but that the barrels are also marked with “Other Patents Pending.”


“The ‘others pending’ doubtless refers to Lucifer J. Most’s 1922 patent, which was applied for in 1918 but wasn’t issued until 1922,” I said.  I was wrong: the patent date seen here is May 2, 1922, not June 20, and it wasn’t issued to Lucifer Most:


On November 27, 1920, James Salz applied for what would be issued on May 2, 1922 as patent number 1,414,752, for a “hard rubber pencil.”  The patent was assigned to Pencil Products Corporation.

That clarifies something else I wrote in Part 1, in which I noted that one of the incorporators of The Pencil Products Corporation was “J. Salz.”  At the time, I couldn’t tell whether “J.” was Ignatz’ brother James or his other brother, Jacob  – fair to say it was James, in light of this patent.

But wait . . .  There’s even more.  Note from the patent drawings that James’ patent shows an internal tube with a pushrod that engages the threaded inner walls of the barrel?  I can’t for the life of me figure out how this wasn’t a violation of Charles Keeeran’s patent for the Eversharp . . . but no worries: that isn’t what’s inside this pencil:


There’s a unique little pushrod inside, with two holes drilled into the flange at one end so that it threads onto a spring:


Once threaded in place, the flange engages into a slot inside, so that turning the top causes the plunger to advance and retract, while the lead is held in place by the tip.


Just like an Autopoint, except the rod is attached inside the barrel instead of being threaded into the tip.   Oh, wait... exactly like an early Autopoint.

I’ve started going through 1920s patents in my book (American Writing Instrument Patents Volume 2: 1911-1945) indexed under “Mechanical pencil (screw drive)" and I’m finding some promising leads, but I’m surprised I’m not seeing this unique propeller rod yet.  The most promising patent I’ve found was issued to Julius Swanberg, applied for on April 2, 1924 and issued on May 24, 1927 as number 1,629,766:


The only differences between this and the Salrite are that the top is threaded in place on the Swanberg patent and the pushrod is designed differently.  Other than that, this pencil is identical to this ‘Salrite – it even shows in Figure 5 holes drilled in the barrel for spare leads, just like the ‘Salrite.  Research continues on this one.

In the meantime, consider one last point – which comes from the first thing I noticed from this pencil when Michael sent me the picture: I was hoping that this pencil might have some more clues tying together the stories of the Pencil Products Corporation and the Chase Pencil Corporation, and it does.  Since the only example I’ve seen of a ‘Salrite with a 1922 patent date is also the only one that has this scrollwork, I believe this feature was added late in the ‘Salrite’s run.  That is consistent with my hypothesis that Salz turned over the brand to Chase, which was manufacturing these pencils all along, after clan Salz butted heads with the Federal Trade Commission and Shur-Rite.

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Before Salz Was Salz, Part III

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 4; copies are available print on demand through Amazon here, and I offer an ebook version in pdf format at the Legendary Lead Company here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

(Note: the first part of this story can be found at 
http://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2016/09/before-salz-was-salz-part-i.html).


Where we left off yesterday, the last mention of the ‘Salrite – and what should have been the eulogy which laid the brand comfortably to rest – was an advertisement from December, 1923, in which the pencils are described as “mottled or black.”   While I understand it’s difficult to hold an advertiser hawking closeouts to strict details concerning the blowout pricing of a discontinued brand, I thought Salrites were made only in black hard rubber:

Until last summer, when this monster popped up in an online auction:


Not just mottled hard rubber, but with gold filled . . . ok, goldish filledish trim?


Note that clip?  It isn’t the usual banded ‘Salrite clip, either.  It appears to be the same clip used on the all-metal ‘Salrites before they were discontinued.  The unmarked cap has some fine detail work to it – it fits neither into the Sta-Sharp nor ‘Salrite usual lines:


It is, however, all ‘Salrite.  All you need do is unscrew the nose to examine the patented spare lead chambers – from which it received the Salz moniker in early advertisements, “The Machine Gun of Commerce”:


So is this an early transitional model, made while all metal pencil clips were still available and before Pencil Products had settled on plain black and plain nickel trim?   Or was it a last gasp, hail Mary attempt to spruce up the brand in late 1923, as suggested by that December advertisement which was the only one to indicate there were mottled hard rubber examples?

I'm still not entirely sure, but I got another clue . . . just before the Chicago show this year, this one popped up online:


Note that the clip and tip, unlike the other example, are nickel plate:


This one has two of those great wide bands:


And on the reverse is a clue not found on any other ‘Salrite:


Chase Pencil Corporation.  I had never heard of the company, and a Google search turned up nothing.  However, when I searched Newspapers.com, I did get one hit which might explain a few things:


This “help wanted” advertisement, which ran on November 5, 1924 in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, states that the Chase Pencil Corporation was a New York City manufacturer, established three years (the first ads for the ‘Salrite appeared in September, 1921), and still making a “meritorious product.”  It would appear, connecting the dots, that the Chase Pencil Corporation, and not the Pencil Products Corporation, was the actual manufacturer of the ‘Salrite.

I’m still no closer to answering the question of whether these mottled hard rubber examples are from the beginning of the line, at the end of the line, or are a previously undocumented deluxe model that ran the continuum.  Nor am I any closer to knowing exactly what sort of cap this new example would have had, since this one is missing and mix-and-match was apparently par for the course on the Chase Pencil Corporation assembly line.   For the time being, though, I couldn’t believe my luck when this part jumped out of Rob Bader’s junk box at the Raliegh show:


Yeah, it’s a nickel trimmed Salrite cap, complete with “Pencil Products Corp.” and the 1919 patent date, but what the heck:


On a pencil with a nickel plated tip and clip, and wide gold filled bands, who’s to say that’s not what they did?

(Tomorrow:  more about inventor Lucifer Most.  Article is at http://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-company-with-most.html.)