Showing posts with label Bailey Banks & Biddle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bailey Banks & Biddle. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

Rounding Up the Victorians

This article has been included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 7, now available here.


If you don't want the book but you enjoy the article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

The collecting universe seems to have a cyclical rhythm.  When I piddle through online auctions, my search is usually for “pencils” rather than for any particular breed or vintage – yet from unrelated sellers, like pencils of similar feathers will flock together to my doorstep.

The image at the beginning of yesterday’s article grouped together a cluster of Victorians that landed here within a fairly short time, from random sources.


For starters, here are three interesting John Hollands:


Represented here from top are a dip pen, a combination dip pen and pencil (based, incidentally, on John Mabie’s October 3, 1854 patent discussed yesterday), and a magic pencil.  


Still, the holder is marked Holland, and as a proud Ohioan, it’s nice to see the Cincinnati maker’s mark:


And then there’s that nib . . . a big, gorgeous, and tougher-to-find Number 6 “horseshoe” nib


The combo is a tiny little thing, with a much smaller Holland Number 2 nib that needs a little bit of work:


What really attracted me to this one is the barrel composition: sterling and rose gold on the barrel, with yellow gold ends and slider ring – two-tone Victorians you’ll find from time to time . . . but tri-tone?  


That third Holland looks like an ordinary magic pencil, but there’s something special about it:


The extender reads “Jno. Holland” on one side, and “Pat. Jul 11 - 76" on the other – and I didn’t have a writing instrument with that patent date in my collection.  It’s listed in American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910: patent number 179,743 was applied for by Edward Tyrell of Cincinnati, Ohio on June 8, 1876.  It was issued with lightning speed in just over a month, and assigned to John Holland:


Next to find its way to me is this large slider pencil, sporting handsome engraving reading “Sophia S. Brown 1853";


Lettering on the other side of the barrel is much smaller but speaks louder, at least to me:


I described it as a “large” slider pencil, and you might not think it is until I tell you it’s a Rauch & Co.  By Rauch standards, it’s a behemoth:


Next up is one of those large “convertible” pencils – you can either extract the pencil leaving the case hooked to a watch chain or use it in the case:


It resembles other pencils I’ve written about here before:


Those other three are a Simmons, a Cross (AXT, for A.T. Cross), and a Mabie Todd:


This one, however, is marked U.S. Fountain Pen Company, predecessor firm to the U.S. Victor Pen Company:


I’m not sure where to file this next one away in my collection.  It has two interesting tells: that distinctive rose gold, and the odd placement of the joint for the twist mechanism, farther towards the end rather than right in the middle:


The seller described it as a Bailey, Banks & Biddle, which was true . . . but it also bears a patent date of June 27, 1865:


I recently wrote about the history of the Philadelphia jewelry firm of Bailey, Banks & Biddle (see Volume 6, page 119).  I’ve also written about the man who received that 1865 patent, a little-known inventor named Frederick W. Cox (Volume 4, page 175).   My only other example of the Cox patent is in black hard rubber, and may have been made by Mabie Todd:


After much agonizing, I decided the two Cox pencils go together . . . and I’m noting that here mostly to remind myself where on earth I put that other Bailey, Banks & Biddle!

Finally, this last one was described in an online auction, as not in working order.  I was feeling a little frisky, so I threw in a nominal bid thinking it might be fun seeing if I could do anything with it. 


I was pleasantly surprised when it arrived to find that the pencil was operating just fine – that was half the battle, anyway . . . 


The nib slider, however, wouldn’t budge at all.  I used the old lighter fluid trick to see if that might loosen things up a bit, and it did – I got it to move forward just far enough that the tip of a nib emerged from the end, and I was able to pull it out: a cheap steel fountain pen nib that had nothing to do with a Victorian (the Holland nib with the horseshoe cutout earlier was an exception -- Victorian dip pen nibs typically don't have breather holes).  

With the nib out, I tried the slider again – no more progress, so I hit it with more lighter fluid, then a little dab of oil in the slit, and the tip of another cheap steel nib peeked out.  


Good Lord . . . how many clowns were going to pop out of this car?  With the second nib extracted, I got my answer as the slider freed up at last.  There were three nibs in this one, and the third was a whopper:


Miraculously, the original F.T. Pearce & Co. nib was undamaged by all the junk that had been shoved on top of it.  Best of all, I didn’t have a Pearce nib in my collection – the closest thing I have is an interesting Pearce & Hoagland from Frank T. Pearce’s earlier partnership (Volume 3, page 3).

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

So I Wouldn't Bug Nishimura Again

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

A few years ago at the DC Show, I bought a collection of pencils from a guy on the first day and spent most of the show at my table – a rarity for me – largely ignoring customers as I sat there opening up totes like there might be a Red Ryder bb gun with a compass in the stock and this thing that tells time lurking in there somewhere.  There was a lot of great stuff in that bunch, much of which filled out missing colors and sizes of models I knew about.  I’m an archivist and librarian more than a collector.

And then there was this thing . . .


There were a couple reasons I haven’t told you about this one before.  Reason Number 1: since this is a pencil blog, I’d want to show you the pencil part and I can’t.  A broken solder weld at the front end, coupled with a gunked up inside I haven’t been able to free up, means I can’t even post it as a decent display piece:


It wasn’t anything I’d put in the parts bins.  The nib is a gorgeous Number 6 sized Fairchild:


And the real reason I kept it around was the imprint on the extender:


“BB&B” followed by 14k.  Which brings me to Reason Number Two this one hasn’t been featured here . . . I asked David Nishimura what “BB&B” stands for, he told me, and I forgot.  I asked him again, he reminded me again, and I forgot again.

Rinse and repeat.  I’d asked him so many times what this stood for that I felt too sheepish to call, even if I had a Sharpie in one hand ready for him to write it on my forehead.  Fortunately, at a pen show a couple years ago – I think it was Chicago – one of my friends (whoever it was, remind me so I can include you!)  had another example of the breed.


Just like the first one, it’s 14k and also in “rose gold” – that pinkish gold that is alloyed with copper to give it that unique color.  I hate buying gold, and I had to pay every cent the metal in this one was worth, but I’ll do it when the occasion calls for it.  And when the piece means I don’t have to phone a friend for the answer (for the umpteenth time), the occasion called for it.


Bailey, Banks & Biddle.  There are modern accounts of this Philadelphia jeweler’s firm out there, but preferring as I do to get information from more direct sources, I rooted around and found an account of the firm’s early history, published in the Harrisburg Daily Independent on the occasion of BB&B’s grand opening of a new store in Philadelphia in 1904:


According to this account, Joseph T. Bailey and Andrew B. Kitchen formed Bailey & Kitchen in 1832, which was renamed Bailey & Co. when Kitchen died in 1844.  After the substitution of various partners over the years, Joseph T. Bailey (the second, son of the original Bailey) affiliated with George W. Banks and Samuel Biddle.  Announcement of the new firm’s name, Bailey, Banks and Biddle, appeared in the Philadelphia Inquirer on March 2, 1878:


A more formal piece followed in May, after the partners got settled into handsome new quarters at Twelfth and Chestnut in downtown Philadelphia:


According to both of these announcements, Banks had been affiliated with J.E. Caldwell, another firm profiled here a while back (see https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2017/07/j-e-caldwell-co.html).  While I didn’t run across Banks’ name in the course of that last article, note that the pencil featured in that article, just like these two, was rendered in that unusual rose gold:


That Caldwell sports a commemorative inscription from 1899, and I think that’s about right for my BB&B pieces, too.  After Banks and Biddle retired, the company was formally organized as a corporation in 1894, styled The Bailey, Banks and Biddle Company.  The earliest mention I found in advertisements offered by the firm was this one, from 1890:


There’s another mention of pencils in 1892 – but in silver, another flavor to keep an eye out for.



Bailey, Banks & Biddle is still in business, if only in name.  In 2007 (the company's 175th anniversary) there were 70 stores in the chain when it was purchased by Finlay for $200 million, but by the beginning of 2019 only 3 locations remained.  In August, 2019, two of those three were also closed, leaving only one location in Houston, Texas.  In November, the company (BBB Group) filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, listing assets of less than $50,000.00 and a string of unpaid vendors and suppliers (Case number 19-36260, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas).  As I write this, it is uncertain whether anything will be left of the firm when the case is over.