Showing posts with label U.S. Fountain Pen Co.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.S. Fountain Pen Co.. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

Rounding Up the Victorians

This article has been included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 7, now available here.


If you don't want the book but you enjoy the article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

The collecting universe seems to have a cyclical rhythm.  When I piddle through online auctions, my search is usually for “pencils” rather than for any particular breed or vintage – yet from unrelated sellers, like pencils of similar feathers will flock together to my doorstep.

The image at the beginning of yesterday’s article grouped together a cluster of Victorians that landed here within a fairly short time, from random sources.


For starters, here are three interesting John Hollands:


Represented here from top are a dip pen, a combination dip pen and pencil (based, incidentally, on John Mabie’s October 3, 1854 patent discussed yesterday), and a magic pencil.  


Still, the holder is marked Holland, and as a proud Ohioan, it’s nice to see the Cincinnati maker’s mark:


And then there’s that nib . . . a big, gorgeous, and tougher-to-find Number 6 “horseshoe” nib


The combo is a tiny little thing, with a much smaller Holland Number 2 nib that needs a little bit of work:


What really attracted me to this one is the barrel composition: sterling and rose gold on the barrel, with yellow gold ends and slider ring – two-tone Victorians you’ll find from time to time . . . but tri-tone?  


That third Holland looks like an ordinary magic pencil, but there’s something special about it:


The extender reads “Jno. Holland” on one side, and “Pat. Jul 11 - 76" on the other – and I didn’t have a writing instrument with that patent date in my collection.  It’s listed in American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910: patent number 179,743 was applied for by Edward Tyrell of Cincinnati, Ohio on June 8, 1876.  It was issued with lightning speed in just over a month, and assigned to John Holland:


Next to find its way to me is this large slider pencil, sporting handsome engraving reading “Sophia S. Brown 1853";


Lettering on the other side of the barrel is much smaller but speaks louder, at least to me:


I described it as a “large” slider pencil, and you might not think it is until I tell you it’s a Rauch & Co.  By Rauch standards, it’s a behemoth:


Next up is one of those large “convertible” pencils – you can either extract the pencil leaving the case hooked to a watch chain or use it in the case:


It resembles other pencils I’ve written about here before:


Those other three are a Simmons, a Cross (AXT, for A.T. Cross), and a Mabie Todd:


This one, however, is marked U.S. Fountain Pen Company, predecessor firm to the U.S. Victor Pen Company:


I’m not sure where to file this next one away in my collection.  It has two interesting tells: that distinctive rose gold, and the odd placement of the joint for the twist mechanism, farther towards the end rather than right in the middle:


The seller described it as a Bailey, Banks & Biddle, which was true . . . but it also bears a patent date of June 27, 1865:


I recently wrote about the history of the Philadelphia jewelry firm of Bailey, Banks & Biddle (see Volume 6, page 119).  I’ve also written about the man who received that 1865 patent, a little-known inventor named Frederick W. Cox (Volume 4, page 175).   My only other example of the Cox patent is in black hard rubber, and may have been made by Mabie Todd:


After much agonizing, I decided the two Cox pencils go together . . . and I’m noting that here mostly to remind myself where on earth I put that other Bailey, Banks & Biddle!

Finally, this last one was described in an online auction, as not in working order.  I was feeling a little frisky, so I threw in a nominal bid thinking it might be fun seeing if I could do anything with it. 


I was pleasantly surprised when it arrived to find that the pencil was operating just fine – that was half the battle, anyway . . . 


The nib slider, however, wouldn’t budge at all.  I used the old lighter fluid trick to see if that might loosen things up a bit, and it did – I got it to move forward just far enough that the tip of a nib emerged from the end, and I was able to pull it out: a cheap steel fountain pen nib that had nothing to do with a Victorian (the Holland nib with the horseshoe cutout earlier was an exception -- Victorian dip pen nibs typically don't have breather holes).  

With the nib out, I tried the slider again – no more progress, so I hit it with more lighter fluid, then a little dab of oil in the slit, and the tip of another cheap steel nib peeked out.  


Good Lord . . . how many clowns were going to pop out of this car?  With the second nib extracted, I got my answer as the slider freed up at last.  There were three nibs in this one, and the third was a whopper:


Miraculously, the original F.T. Pearce & Co. nib was undamaged by all the junk that had been shoved on top of it.  Best of all, I didn’t have a Pearce nib in my collection – the closest thing I have is an interesting Pearce & Hoagland from Frank T. Pearce’s earlier partnership (Volume 3, page 3).

Monday, June 8, 2020

Behind the Victor

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

A few weeks ago, I posted an article about whether there was any connection between broker pencils marked “Victor” and those marked “Victorian” (see “Victor/Victoria(n)”).  In the time since, two things have happened: first, by chance, I found a full length version which, like the other one in my collection, has more wear to the trim than you’d expect to see on a higher quality pencil:



The other thing that happened was that David Nishimura posted an online comment that brings this next pencil into sharp focus:


This beefier broker pencil shares the same clip and it nearly made it into that last article by accident – it isn’t marked Victor or Victorian, but I picked it up and included it in the first shots by mistake, since it happens to reside right next to them.  I keep these arranged in alphabetical order:


“U.S. Fount. Pen Co. NY.”  David’s comment was that the “Victor” name was a trademark of the U.S. Fountain Pen Company of New York.  You’ve seen that connection before here at the blog – it came up back in July 2012, in connection with a Victor convertible set (The Leadhead’s Pencil Blog Volume 1, page 284):



Well, sort of.  This set included a complete instruction sheet, identifying the manufacturer of the patented pen, using “System Edward Hugetz,” as the U.S. Victor Fountain Pen Co., Inc., not the U.S. Fountain Pen Company:



The pencils from these sets are all unmarked except for the clip, but the pens had a great imprint on the barrel:


In 2017, I ran across the trademark filing for that very trademark (hence the “Reg. U.S. Pat. Off.” included on the imprint) while I was researching American Writing Instrument Trademarks 1870-1953, and I included everything I could find in the book.  Unfortunately, this was one of the handful of registrations for which the original trademark registration certificate has been lost by the patent office, so the only place I could find the image for this one was in the pages of the Official Gazette, where the mark was published for opposition:


Edward Hugetz filed for registration of this mark in his own name individually, without any mention of the U.S. Fountain Pen Company (other than the “U.S.F.P.Co.” within that oval).  Hugetz first claimed to have used this mark on Fountain and Stylographic Pens on May 1, 1916, and the mark was registered on March 27, 1917 as number 115,967.  While the scant information I could find with respect to this filing doesn’t mention pencils, Hugetz filed an updated trademark for “Victor” on March 17, 1952, and it was issued on December 8, 1953; it’s one of the last marks included in the book chronologically, before the Patent Office changed the way it indexes marks and made them nearly impossible to research by subject in 1954.


In his 1952 registration, Hugetz spells out in detail when he began to use the mark on various products, claiming that his first use of it on mechanical pencils occurred in 1916.  While I haven’t found any Victor-marked pencils made that early, I have found one from the 1920s:


This green gold filled pencil has an intricate chasing pattern on the barrel:


And, at the top, “Victor” in the same script as the pen in my convertible set:


This pencil wasn’t made by the U.S. Fountain Pen Company, though, and it doesn’t reside with my other Victor pencils.  It resides where it belongs, in the Rex Manufacturing Company section.  That’s right, my early Victor is an early example of McNary’s February 19, 1924 patent.