This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 4; copies are available print on demand through Amazon here, and I offer an ebook version in pdf format at the Legendary Lead Company here.
If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.
When it’s a duplicate...
Take this, for example:
This WASP Clipper isn’t one you see very often, and to find it on a price card? With spare leads and erasers? Yeah, the paper is a little ragged, but when have you ever seen a WASP product card? Oh, and with a price sticker???
Wow – a dollar price tag, with fifteen cents’ worth of erasers, plus a container of lead – all for 95 cents?
So, I figured, I’d take the one in my collection with me to the Triangle Show, where I would have no trouble finding it a new home. Except I hadn’t noticed a couple things:
First off, the example I have is missing the eraser, and then there’s the clips . . .
The one which came with a product card has that neat WASP clip with a stylized “W” at the top, while the example I already had is adorned with a flat clip. So even though the pencils are otherwise identical, including the imprints, I guess I’ll keep both of them.
Speaking of imprints, this next one was an accident. I fell in love with it when it showed up in an auction:
When it arrived, I was excited to take it to the museum and see how it looked next to the other colors and . . .
Dang. I already had one, and the color on the one I had was nicer than the new addition. But, as I always do before I consign something to the sale pile, I took a closer look, and whaddaya know:
One is a Clipper, while the other is a "Thinline."
And then there was this . . . one of these, I don’t remember which, came from the Philadelphia “Snow Bowl” show of 2016, at which I was a little bored, with cash in my pocket, and buying a pencil knowing it was probably a duplicate but picking it up because it was sooooo cheap:
and on closer examination:
One has the earlier "WASP/Vacuum-Fil Pen Co." imprint.
No comments:
Post a Comment