Showing posts with label Acme. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Acme. Show all posts

Sunday, July 18, 2021

Definitely a Doggie

This article has been included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 7, now available here.


If you don't want the book but you enjoy the article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

Years ago while I was editing The Pennant, I used a connect-the-dots metaphor to address how theories become proven history.  Let’s say you have two dots on a sheet of paper and say “I see a doggie,” sure – you can draw any kind of dog you want around it, hitting both dots, but no matter how fervently you argue the point, two dots doth not a doggie make.

Random bits of evidence are like dots on a page, and when enough of them are assembled, the statement “that’s a doggie” morphs from unsubstantiated canine obsession to the obvious.  However, that never means a researcher should abandon a close examination of where new dots land on the page - an errant dot too far from a quadruped’s face might make the difference between a dog and an elephant.

I employed this analogy in response to harsh initial criticism of “Wahl, Sheaffer and the Race for Boston,” a series of articles from 2016 (starting in Volume 4, page 300) which presented the case for Sheaffer actually interfering with Wahl’s purchase of the Boston Fountain Pen Company, and Sheaffer’s surreptitious acquisition of Boston’s fledgling pencil development by Boston’s Superintendent at the time, David J. LaFrance (of Dewitt-LaFrance fame).  The story seemed fantastic when I first introduced it – “You can write it, but it didn’t happen,” one person commented.

Five years later, a few other dots have landed on the page, but none have fallen outside the distinct outline of man’s best friend.   Eventually, unless something new comes up, the consensus will be yes . . . it happened.

My recent article on Parker’s entry into the pencil business is similar (see https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2021/04/checking-off-all-boxes.html).  All the dots line up with the story that the American Metals Company was making Perfect Point and Acme pencils until Parker came along and became – to continue the analogy – the tail that wagged the dog.  I’ve theorized that American Metals had already developed a new pencil and that Parker, which suddenly realized it had to start offering pencils and it needed to do so fast, couldn’t afford to wait the two years Parker claimed it spent developing what would become the “Non-Clog” or “Lucky Lock” pencil. 

That meant, drawing a straight line between two distant dots, that American Metals was already making something that Parker took over.  On that straight line, however, was a crucial missing dot: something that looks exactly like a Parker, but isn’t marked as a Parker.  Something like this:


I bought it in an online auction half expecting that there was an oversight and it might be marked Parker, but other than the nice machine-engraved pattern on the barrel, this one is completely unmarked.   There are differences from most Parkers.  It is smaller and thinner than usual:


Also, this doesn’t have Parker’s Lucky Lock cap - in fact, it doesn’t budge at all, just like those later Acme pencils I had theorized were made by American Metals:


Oh, but that’s a longshot . . . if this pencil just looks like a Parker, but lacks a Lucky Lock cap, how can we be sure this pencil isn’t unrelated to the story?  Because of this:


These two pencils are identical, except my other example has no engraving.  Neither one has a Lucky Lock cap, the size is identical, and there’s one other difference: the other example is clearly marked with a Parker imprint.


Does this prove it?  No, but this dot fits squarely on the lines between the other dots.  If one like this surfaces, marked “Acme,” that would be the clincher wrapping up the entire story neatly with a bow on top.  For now, I’m content to see this particular doggie advancing one step closer to saying “woof.”


Friday, April 16, 2021

Checking Off All the Boxes

This article has been included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 7, now available here.


If you don't want the book but you enjoy the article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

Note:  this is the third part of a series.  If you landed here directly, part one is posted at https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2021/04/perfect-on-third-try.html.

As mentioned earlier, the sudden, inexplicable demise of the Perfect Point pencil is like a century-old murder investigation.  Something catastrophic must have happened in order for Stull-Boylson to collapse just as it appeared the Perfect Point was rocketing in popularity.  Did the Attleboro firm that made the pencils obstruct Stull-Boylson’s efforts to start making the Perfect Point on its own?  Did the Wahl Company, makers of the “Perfect Point Eversharp” engage in a Trojan Horse operation to get control of the company, only to kill it off?  

Now that I’ve dug around trying to find out who was making the Perfect Point, as well as the Acme, I’m firmly convinced it wasn’t a murder at all – both the Perfect Point and the Acme, I believe, were simply collateral damage.  

The first clue I found as I searched for Attleboro pencil manufacturers was a curious reference:


In the February, 1922 edition of The Metal Industry, under “Verified News” a firm named “American Metals Company,” “busy manufacturing gold and silver pencils and other metal novelties,” had packed up its stakes and left Attleboro, Masachusetts, relocating to Janesville, Wisconsin.  

That can’t be random, I thought. There is only one logical reason for anyone in the writing instruments business to move to Janesville: The Parker Pen Company.

I’ve described Parker’s entry into the mechanical pencil business as an “Oh Crap” moment: after decades of ignoring mechanical pencils as companions to the company’s pens, Parker realized by 1921 that Sheaffer and Wahl had come out of nowhere to command a significant market share at Parker’s expense.  Pencils were no longer a point of distinction among manufacturers, an extra that could et a company apart from the pack.  Pencils had become a point of parity, and any company that wasn’t offering them by 1921 was falling behind.  

Parker had recognized that it needed to do something to maintain its position as a market leader, and with the onset of the 1921 mini-Depression, it needed to do something quick.  Did Parker reinvent the wheel, developing its own pencil and all the equipment and expertise it needed to make them on a large scale overnight?

No.


On June 4, 1921, the Janesville Daily Gazette reported that Janesville would soon be the production center for a new mechanical pencil to be made by the American Metals Company, “associated with the Parker Pen Company of this city.”  The article states that production “in the eastern plant” was under the direction of J.S. Gilman, but all of the machinery would be relocated to Janesville and installed on the fourth floor of Parker’s new building by the beginning of 1922.

Although the article states that American Metals Company was a new company, incorporated for $100,000, it stops short of stating that it was incorporated by Parker representatives.  A short piece in The Capital Times (Madison, Wisconsin) on June 7, 1921 stated that American Metals “will be associated with the Parker Pen Company,” suggesting that Parker was in the process of purchasing an ongoing concern:


The Janesville Daily Gazette reported on September 24, 1921 that Parker’s new pencils “are now being manufactured in Attleboro, Massachusetts”:


On October 15, 1921, The Janesville Daily Gazette indicated that the pencil was on the market as of that week and 5,000 pencils had been presold “without even a sample to show.”  The article further states that American Metals Company was, at least by that time, a wholly owned subsidiary of Parker:


I haven’t been able to find evidence concerning when the “American Metals Company” was established, or by whom.  Another “American Metal Company,” from New York, was one of the largest American smelting companies – it was broken up during World War I when it was discovered that controlling interests in that company were owned by German companies, which used American Metal to divert American metallurgical products for use in the German war effort.

Even if we were to assume that Parker set up all the machinery and equipment to make pencils from scratch, Parker wouldn’t have set everything up in distant Attleboro, only to move its new company to Janesville just a few months later.  There are two possibilities:  either American Metals Company was already in existence and Parker bought it, or Parker set up a new company for the purpose of buying some other existing business.

That suspicion is further supported in Parker’s 1923 catalog, a copy of which resides in the Pen Collectors of America’s library.  The catalog illustrates pencils in “triple plate,” sterling, gold filled and green gold filled:


Note the introductory text, in Parker’s own words:


If Parker’s pencils were “in the process of development and refinement for a period of two years before being first offered to the public for sale,” that means development and refinement started in 1919 – and there’s no evidence Parker was seriously considering making pencils prior to 1921.

The addition of the American Metals Company to the Parker story explains something else about Parker’s entry into the pencil business: I reported Parker’s patent for what would become Parker’s “Non-Clog” (later “Lucky Lock”) pencil in American Writing Instrument Patents Vol. 2: 1911-1945:


The patent, number 1,632,371, took an unusually long time to be issued.  The inventor was George Washington Gilman – of Attleboro, Massachusetts, and doubtless a relative of the “J.S. Gilman” whom Parker reported was supervising pencil manufacturing in Attleboro.  It was applied for on November 7, 1921 and was assigned, “by mesne assignments,” to Parker when it finally issued on June 14, 1927.


“Mesne assignments” means there was at least one intervening assignee, probably American Metals Company – that would make sense, because Parker likely absorbed and dissolved American Metals by 1927.

Gilman patented two other innovations, both of which issued more quickly and both of which were assigned to American Metals Company.  The first, patent 1,442,720, was for a price marker band, applied for on July 5, 1922 and issued on January 16, 1923.  The text indicates it was made of metal “or other resilient metal,” clipped around a pencil or pen and removed at the point of sale for reuse:


The other was for the familiar clip found on Parker Lucky Lock pencils: Gilman applied for patent number 1,468,562 on September 1, 1922, and it was issued September 18, 1923:


A few early Parker pencils made by American Metals Company have worked their way into my collection.  In ringtop configuration, I’ve found two sizes not shown in Parker’s catalogs: an extra short model, and an extra thin one:



All but one are stamped below the cap; the short stubby example has the stamp on the cap:


That example also includes an additional “Made in USA” imprint, suggesting slightly later production


Side clip models track what is shown in Parker’s 1923 catalog, in two sizes:


It’s a real shame the clip is broken on that sterling example - that pattern, like undulating waves, isn’t shown in the catalog.


I look at these pencils now with a fresh set of eyes.  Last fall, Wayne Bagley asked me to have a look at a Lucky Lock pencil of his that wasn’t working.  After a bit of fiddling, I figured out how to extract the mechanism and replace it with one I had on hand:


I need to find Wayne’s broken mechanism, so I can further dissect it and compare its components to the Acme – I know that I kept it, but finding it is like roaming a vast junkyard.  I’m sure that when I find it, I’ll also find undeniable similarities: all bells and whistles aside, at the core of a Lucky Lock pencil is that same propel-repel device I found inside the Acme.

History floats to the surface when seemingly random facts are put in order.  When I overlay the Parker, Perfect Point and Acme stories, a seamless version of events emerges:

1.  Jacob Stull invents the Perfect Point sometime prior to June of 1919, when he applied for his patent.  He becomes associated with E.J. Boylson of Attleboro, Massachusetts, who arranges for a firm in Attleboro to manufacture Stull’s new pencil.  I believe that firm was owned by George Washington Gilman and J.S. Gilman – maybe it was called “American Metals Company,” but maybe it was called something else.

2.  Stull-Boylson was a customer of the Gilmans’ “eastern plant,” but the arrangement was not exclusive.  In addition to manufacturing “Perfect Point” pencils, the Gilmans manufactured Acme pencils for jewelry wholesaler Max J. Averbeck using much of the same machinery, but with internal differences developed independently by George Washington Gilman that differentiated the Acme, so that it didn’t infringe on Stull’s patent.

3.  At the same time, George Washington Gilman was  developing another pencil design, which would ultimately become the Lucky Lock.  

4.  The Parker Pen Company decided to offer mechanical pencils to accompany its pens – Parker claimed that decision was in 1919, but it was probably in 1921, due to market pressures exacerbated by the 1921 Depression.  Parker didn’t want to start from scratch (and didn’t have time to do so), so the company approached the Gilmans and become interested in acquiring the Gilmans’ company, including the new design George was developing.

5.  By mid-1921, Parker announces that it will become affiliated with American Metals Company, and plans are announced to relocate American Metals from Attleboro to Janesville by the beginning of 1922.  By the end of 1921, American Metals is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parker; it is unclear whether Parker purchased the company from the Gilmans, or whether it was established by Parker as a standalone company.

6.  At the beginning of 1922, American Metals relocates to Janesville as planned, and its machinery and equipment are installed on the fourth floor of the Parker Pen Company’s new building.

7.  The Gilmans, either through American Metals or through some other company, may have continued to manufacture Perfect Point pencils as the company transitioned to Janesville, but it became increasingly impractical (not to mention awkward) as Parker took over the company.  The Gilmans ceased production of the Acme, and Averbeck is “out of business” as far as pencils are concerned.

8.  Stull-Boylson had no manufacturing capability of its own, and unlike Parker, it had to start from scratch now that the Gilmans’ firm and equipment had become Parker property.  Stull-Boylson scrambled to raise capital in September, 1922, and E.J. Boylson went to Attleboro in October, 1922 to attempt to acquire the machinery, equipment and expertise to continue production of the Perfect Point.  The effort failed, and Stull-Boylson “retired” from the business by mid-1923: the company sold all its remaining stock to a local bookstore and collapsed.

I look at Perfect Point and Acme pencils from a different perspective now, because I think Parker counted the time during which the Gilmans were making Perfect Points and modifying Stull’s design into the Acme as Parker’s two years of “development and refinement” of what would become the Lucky Lock pencil.  Viewed in this light, while the Perfect Point and Acme were independent products with their own separate histories, they are rightly seen as evolutionary steps in the development of Parker’s “Lucky Lock” pencils.

Thursday, April 15, 2021

Suspecting the Former

This article has been included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 7, now available here.


If you don't want the book but you enjoy the article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

Note:  this is the second installment in a three-part series.  If you landed here directly, the first installment is posted at https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2021/04/perfect-on-third-try.html.

It’s impossible to discuss the Perfect Point without mentioning its crude cousin, the “Acme,” and I do have something new to show in that department, as well:


Third from bottom is the new addition.  An online seller had several Acme pencils with original price stickers; I was surprised how much a couple of the full-length pencils brought, but when one of the ringtops came around I was better prepared:


I’ve always associated the Acme with the Prefect Point, due to the similarities between the two:


Other than patterns (and the fact that the Acme came in three sizes, rather than just two), the only real difference I’ve noted between Acmes and Perfect Points is at the top end.  While the Perfect Point has a top button attached to a lead magazine, the Acme has a shorter button, more coarsely threaded, and spare leads are stored in the barrel itself:


There is, however, one other important difference inside:


Missing from the Acme is Jacob Stull’s patented combination pushrod and screw drive.  That subtle difference I believe, is what unravels the story of the relationship between these two brands.

From yesterday’s article, we know that Perfect Point pencils were made for Stull-Boylson by some unknown firm in Attleboro, Massachusetts, until Stull-Boylson suddenly decided to set up its own manufacturing operations in Lima, Ohio in late 1922, only to fail and “retire” from the business by mid-1923.  I mentioned that it was unclear whether Perfect Point pencils were made by an independent firm on Stull-Boylson’s behalf, or whether they happened to be made off-site using Stull-Boylson’s own equipment.  I suspected the former, and I believe the Acme proves it.

In the last article I wrote about the Perfect Point (Volume 1, page 334) I also discussed the Acme.  The brand name was reportedly used by jeweler Max J. Averbeck of New York, who was “out of business” by 1922, when that year’s issue of Trade-Marks of the Jewelry and Kindred Trades was published:


“Acme” is a generic name, and there may have been more than one.  An “Acme Pencil Company” in Pennsylvania looked promising, until I noticed that it was in operation well before these would have been made.  No trademark registration was ever granted for the name, probably because it was so generic, so I was left to see when and by whom these pencils were offered.

References I found to an Acme all-metal propelling pencil are consistent with them being offered by a jewelry wholesaler such as Averbeck, but he was most certainly not “out of business” in 1922 as claimed – perhaps he simply was no longer offering pencils under the Acme name by then.  There was a flurry of advertisements for the pencils in mid-1921; these appeared in the New Castle (Pennsylvania) Herald (this one is from June 1):


This mention was in the Hartford (Connecticut) Courant on June 10, 1921, establishing that Acme pencils were widely distributed:


Advertisements in 1922 show a different version of the Acme, with a bell top lacking that screw-in eraser.  This one was in the Akron Beacon Journal on December 20, 1922:


These resemble other versions of the Acme, that I haven’t been able to place:


Then, the Acme – just like the Perfect Point – disappears.

The Acme and Perfect Point pencils are so similar that they must have been made using the same equipment and tooling.  The Acme is a later, modified version of the Perfect Point design, different enough from the Perfect Point that it wouldn’t infringe Stull’s patent.  There is no connection I have been able to find between Stull-Boylson and Max Averbeck.  

The conclusion is inescapable that one firm in Attleboro, Massachusetts made pencils for two unrelated customers using the same machinery and equipment.  

And that same firm quit making both brands, some time in 1921 or 1922.

I started digging around, trying to figure out what Attleboro pencil maker might have been that manufacturer, and what made that company stop doing so.  I found one that checked off all the boxes, and suddenly an untold story emerges which explains the Perfect Point, the Acme . . . and pencils introduced by a third, much better-known company . . . 

A company that was having an “Oh Crap, we’d better start offering pencils quick” epiphany at precisely that moment.  

Note:  the story continues at https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2021/04/checking-off-all-boxes.html.

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Hey . . . Wait A Minute

Back on September 10, 2012, I wrote an article about the origins of the "Perfect Point" pencils, which I’d learned were made by the Stull-Bolyson Company of Fremont, Ohio (see https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2012/09/a-perfect-end-to-story.html). I made an offhand comment, towards the end of the article, that the "Acme" pencil was the Perfect Point’s identical twin:


Now that I’ve found this one in an online auction, I’m more inclined to call them cousins, rather than twins:


To learn more, this full article is included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 2, available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble and everywhere else you buy books, or you can order a copy signed by yours truly through the Legendary Lead Company HERE.



Monday, September 10, 2012

A Perfect End To The Story

Here’s a beautiful little pencil that turned up at the Springfield Antique Show.

This is a "Perfect Point" (and yes, the name is in quotations) . . .

NOTE:  This article is now included in the print version of The Leadhead's Pencil Blog, available anywhere you buy books, or also from The Legendary Lead Company.

To order, here's the link:  Volume 1 at Legendary Lead Company