Showing posts with label Shur-Rite. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shur-Rite. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 25, 2025

This Marvelous Human Endeavor

Nearly everything I acquire these days is brought to me by friends at pen shows or comes from someone who has stumbled across this blog and emailed me. When I am out on the prowl at antique shows and malls, I rarely find anything that interests me; it sometimes seems like we are reaching a singularity in which all the pens and pencils are already in the hands of collectors. 

Imagine my elation when Janet and I walked into an antique mall we had not visited for some time in September, and the first showcase inside the door looked like this:


I asked the person working the desk to let me have a look – might as well bring the whole box up to the counter, I told her, because this might take a while. Most of it wasn’t worth buying, but there were a few things that were reasonably priced. I still probably overpaid, but it’s hard to maintain interest in the thrill of the chase if you never catch anything.


The top one is another of those Hicks snail-patterned pencils; nothing to write home about, but it’s clean and people like these at pen shows. The next two items in this little haul are a pair of Tiffany ballpoints. They aren’t the prettiest – that’s Exhibit A for the premise that Tiffany-marked stuff is like Ohio State memorabilia (put that name on a dried out dog turd and they would sell like hotcakes). Still . . . the two patterns were nice to buy together, and they aren’t bad additions to the Tiffany section at the museum, which now also includes a Tiffany magic pencil that came from Rob Bader’s Victorian haul.



The next one, in floral-engraved sterling, has a hallmark near the nose - an F in a shield. That denotes Fairchild & Co., the last incarnation of the firm founded by Leroy Fairchild, as carried on by his son Harry from 1905 until 1927 (see “Three of a Kind . . . Maybe Four” on March 23, 2018: Volume 5, page 199). You don’t see those often, especially in the wild, and I didn’t have one like it. 

Next is something I don’t normally chase; it’s unmarked, but I just liked it. The three colored buttons on top indicate the lead colors in the three pencils nested inside.



That had me going back through the Victorian haul from Rob Bader looking for something I thought wound up in my pile, and it did. Rob’s is also unmarked, which is why it wound up in inventory rather than the museum . . . 


Two’s a coincidence and three’s a collection, as Janet always says. Dammit, there’s no point putting these back in inventory, because I know myself . . . when the next one comes along, I know I’ll bite and I’ll drive myself crazy trying to find these two again. They now reside in the “unmarked but worthy” wing at the museum, with a space next to them for the day I know will eventually come.

That blue plastic fountain pen with what looks like a modern plastic clip is much older and better than it looks: it’s a “Graphomatic,” made by the Sager Barrel O’ Ink guys. I have wanted an example of my own since Richard Binder allowed me to use an image of one in his collection in a piece I wrote about a Graphomatic double-ended pencil – see “A Name Closer to Right” (April 15, 2020: Volume 6, page 48).  



Then there’s that Eversharp lookalike at bottom - it’s actually a Shur-Rite, and even though it’s really clean, I’ve got a couple others just like it at home.


I had to have it anyway, even though it was a bit overpriced, because of what was on the top: “Awarded by L.C. Smith & Bros. Typw. Co.,” it reads.

With my little pile of goodies waiting in my bin at the checkout counter, Janet and I explored the rest of the mall and I found . . . absolutely nothing. The thrill of the chase was losing all of its thrill as we trudged along, and I began to have an existential moment wondering what the heck I’m doing. I’ve chased these things for more than twenty five years now, and I’ve got more of them than I’ll ever have time to write about, much less use – even if I wrote one word with each one for my next book.

Maybe that’s an exaggeration. I write a lot.

Whenever I have these thoughts, it makes me remember something I first heard in 1995 that has dogged me ever since. That was when I first watched what I consider to be the finest hour of television that ever aired: it was an episode of The X-Files titled “Clyde Bruckman’s Final Repose” - season three, episode four for those of you who track that sort of thing.

Peter Boyle (best remembered as Ray Romano’s dad in Everybody Loves Raymond) guest starred as Clyde Bruckman, an insurance salesman with a unique but very limited gift: he knew how and when any particular person would die.

As Mulder and Scully investigated the murders of several fortune tellers, Mulder tried to tap Bruckman’s gifts by taking him to the scene of the latest crime. There, standing in the midst of the victim’s extensive collection of dolls, Mulder asks Bruckman if he had any insights into what motivated the killer. Bruckman’s response has haunted me.

“Why does anyone do the things they do?” Bruckman replies. “Why do I sell insurance? I wish I knew. Why did this woman collect dolls? What was it about her life? Was it one specific moment where she suddenly said, ‘I know... dolls.’ Or was it a whole series of things? Starting when her parents first met that somehow combined in such a way that in the end, she had no choice but to be a doll colle...” 

With that, Bruckman has a vision, and he trails off mid-sentence.

I reached the end of that aisle in the antique mall as I thought once again about Clyde Bruckman’s words, musing as I have done countless times why I was doing what I was doing. This time, the tumblers of the universe aligned at that precise moment; I rounded the corner, and I found something.

It wasn’t a pencil. It was my explanation.

There, laying in the center of an antique table, was a coffee table book titled The Baseball Companion. It was opened to display what was written inside the front cover: 


“Scott - 

“Since I can’t always be your ‘companion,’ maybe this book can substitute and remind you of the good times we had playing catch in the backyard . . . . . and how that helped you go on to be a champion with the A’s (and with everything else that you have accomplished)!

Love,

Dad 

8/3/95

“P.S. Remember, God will be your “companion” always, and will keep you a champion -”

With that, just like Clyde Bruckman also did in 1995, “Dad” trails off . . . leaving me standing there thirty years later, in the middle of an antique mall trying to hold back the tears.

That’s it. That’s always been it.

Whether or not I have always known it, my fascination with writing tools and with writing about those tools has been a celebration of the miracle that is the act of writing itself. “Scott’s” father dragged a stick with a bit of ink in it across a piece of paper thirty years ago, and the shapes he made with that stick planted forceful and visceral emotions into my head that remain every bit as powerful today.

Writing is powerful. Whether it’s a pen, or a pencil, or an old typewriter, or a laptop – the tool doesn’t matter, but the raw and awe-inspiring capabilities these things have in the hands of the humans who wield them does. Sometimes that power is used for good, and sometimes it is used for evil. Nearly always, what is good or evil is mostly a matter of perspective.

We are born, we tamp down the earth beneath our feet as we walk around this little round rock for a while, and then we are gone. To paraphrase comedian Randy Feltface in “Randy Writes a Novel” (another hour well worth spending), life is just that insignificant hyphen in between birth and death. We leave no trace of what we thought, who we loved, or who we didn’t. For better or for worse, all of that ends when we do.

Unless we write.

I write books about pencils, tools that by themselves are of no real consequence. When I write an article, there’s something more to it than the pencil itself, and thanks to Scott’s father I can finally articulate why. Telling you these stories connects me with you – and your children, and your children’s children – in a way that nothing else in life can do. Every anecdote that is preserved passes on human thoughts and emotions from which future generations may benefit and learn in some small way. 

It doesn’t matter whether you agree with me or whether the words I write please you, anger you, enlighten you, or bewilder you. It is a marvelous human endeavor that I can press buttons on a machine and no matter the distance, no matter the decade – you feel something.

I didn’t buy that copy of The Baseball Companion, as much as I wanted to bring it home. To extrapolate on Clyde Bruckman, imagine all of the things that had to occur for that instant to happen, at exactly the right time. Whether by design or by an incredible series of coincidences, I was given this amazing gift and I do not believe that gift was only for me. I left that book right where it was in the hopes that others would see it and would be as moved as I was – surprised by the unexpected emotions welling up inside them as they experience an inexplicable and intimate connection with a person they have never met. Maybe that in turn would provide them with a greater appreciation for the connections they have with those in their own lives. 

Maybe they will go home, pick up the phone, and call their own fathers - or their children, or whoever else is important to them.

Maybe now that I’ve told you this story, you will, too. 

Monday, May 7, 2018

Now Wait A Minute . . .

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 5; copies are available print on demand through Amazon here, and I offer an ebook version in pdf format at the Legendary Lead Company here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

I recently bought a grouping of several pencils from my friend Chris Egolf, solely because there was an early Dur-O-Lite in the bunch I was compelled to add to the stash (the Dur-O-Lite appeared here on April 11 (“No Pshaws for Personalizations Here at 
https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2018/04/no-pshaws-for-personalizations-here.html).

As always, after I’d properly ooohed and aaahed over the Dur-O-Lite, I spent some time looking at the other things that were in the group - parts only, as they had been described.  There were some unusual things in there - like this tired little guy:


Chris indicated that he thought he could make out the word “Butterfly” ghosted on the brass, and he was right - these don’t come along often, either.  Here it is alongside less tired specimens:


Then there was this Mabie Todd, with kind of a neat feature:


The rounded gold filled top is very nice:


If this one didn’t have a horrible crack in the barrel, this would have been a real prize.  I particularly like the initials engraved on the nose cone; ordinarily you wouldn’t see that down there:


But it was the last items in the group that really had me scratching my head. Check out these two:


If you read the clips, you’re looking at a Waterman and a Morrison.  But there’s something a little bit off about these: the noses on both of them look out of place.  On closer examination:


The Waterman has been retrofitted with an Autopoint mechnaism, and the “Morrison” is actually just a Morrison cap installed on an Autopoint pencil.

Then there was this thing, which I couldn’t wait to get a closer look at from the auction pictures:


It’s a relatively modern 2.0mm leadholder mechanism which appears to have been installed on something much earlier.  The pattern on the barrel is a very distinctive one I’ve only ever seen in one other place:


This frankenpencil is a repurposed Shur-Rite barrel.

I was convinced there had to be more to this story, so I emailed Chris to see what the deal was.  “It was my Grandfather, Warren ‘Pete’ Egolf, who liked to make sure everything in his collection was working, even if it meant cutting it apart,” Chris replied.  He sent me a picture of a few other of his grandfather’s specially modified pencils which he’s keeping for now:


The bottom one in that last picture really caught my attention - in one of the other pictures, I could see “Ever-Sharp” imprinted, which had me really excited.


That barrel pattern is nearly identical to an early Sharp Point pencil in my collection (the earliest Sheaffers), and I’ve found hints that Charles Keeran, inventor of the Eversharp, might have had some clandestine involvement in assisting Walter Sheaffer with introducing a mechanical pencil.

I’m still not sure why this barrel matches my early Sharp Point so closely, but Chris was able to supply more information to help me identify where it came from.  On the opposite side of the barrel there’s a patent number: 650,078.



You’ve seen that patent here before, in an entirely different context.   It was issued to Albert J. Keck on May 22, 1900, on an application he filed on September 16, 1898;


There were, in fact, two “Eversharps,” and this was the earlier one: it was a multipoint pencil, in which there were several short leads loaded one behind the other within the barrel.  Usually, though, these come in a cheaply made, wood incarnation:


I wrote about these here about five years ago (see https://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2013/02/a-wooden-eversharp.html) and indexed the article under “Eversharp (the other one).”

Unfortunately, while Pete’s modifications might have made it work, it makes this clue that much more tantalizing.  Is it a coincidence that there was an Ever-sharp that looked like a Sharp Point?

There are no coincidences, in my experience.  Just connections which have not been fully revealed.

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Flash in a Pan

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 4; copies are available print on demand through Amazon here, and I offer an ebook version in pdf format at the Legendary Lead Company here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

Note: this is the third article in a three-part series.  The link to the first part of this series is at http://leadheadpencils.blogspot.com/2016/01/was-this-beginning-or-end.html.

There were three players in the Shur-Rite story: the Fabert Instrument Company, to whom Julius Swanberg’s patents were assigned; the Sandfelder Corporation, which was the producer of the pencils; and of course, the Shur-Rite Pencil Company.    The earliest reference I could find to any of these entities is in June, 1921, which doesn’t make much sense: Shur-Rites marked “patent applied for” or with the application date of November 10, 1919 are as common as those marked with the actual patent date of June 14, 1921, so we know these pencils were made before then.

Another thing that doesn’t make sense is that this first reference suggests that the company was already established:


In June, 1921, the same month in which S.N. Sandfelder was back in his office, the earliest advertisement I could find for the Shur-Rite was published in The Allen Monthly:


The American Stationer reported on the introduction of the “new” Shur-Rite Junior on July 2, 1921, which also doesn’t make sense: Junior models are also found marked patent applied for:


A notice in the September 28, 1921 issue of The Jewelers’ Circular provides us with a couple more names associated with the Shur-Rite Pencil Company: George A. Armstrong, Milton Sandfelder, Harry Berblinger, Sidney L. Bauman and J. Frank Kissick:


All indications from this notice are that business was going gangbusters for the new company - on October 19, 1921, Shur-Rite had a full-page advertisement in The Jewelers’ Circular:


That same month, Armstrong, Berblinger and Kissick set off to divide and conquer across the country:


Shur-Rite’s advertising really kicked into high gear in 1922, with advertisements in Good Hardware, Allen Monthly and, most notably, in several advertisements in The Saturday Evening Post:




Also in 1922, the Bostwick-Braun Company of Toledo included in its catalog the full line of Shur-Rite pencils, showing just how extensive the company’s offerings became in such a short time:




Then, just as things were taking off, the wheels came off the proverbial bus.  By the end of 1922, surplus Shur-Rites are showing up in discount advertisements.  The Order of Railroad Telegraphers acquired a large surplus order, had them fitted with ORT logos, and advertised them for sale to members in The Railroad Telegrapher throughout 1922:


On January 3, 1923, The Jewelers’ Circular referred to Kissick and Berblinger as “former representatives of the Sandfelder Corp.”


The epitaph for Shur-Rite appears to have been its legal victory of Salz Brothers.  When Salz attempted to register “Salrite” as a trademark, Shur-Rite successfully objected – one of the few times Salz (which had a reputation for copying others) was called out for deliberately trying to profit from someone else’s good name:


And then . . . without a trace . . . the company vanishes.

Almost.  Feeling a little ripped off yet that I haven’t explained those Shur-Rite lead tubes with “Franklin Automatic Pencil” lead labels glued over them?



I think I have found the answer.  A prominent Boston Stationer, Thorp & Martin, had only recently moved to Franklin Street in Boston when this article about the firm was published in late 1920:


“By this move to Franklin Street, the Thorp & Martin came into what might be termed a “stationers’ row” of Boston, with [Samuel] Ward’s nearly opposite and the Fairbanks Company at the head of the thoroughfare,” this writeup concludes.   Later reports proudly refer to the company as “Thorp & Martin of Franklin Street,” as if the location made them a real contender in the stationers’ world – such as this one from June, 1921, announcing among other things, that the company “had secured control of the entire sale in New England of the Shur-Rite pencil”:


The following month, Walden’s Stationer reported that the company was the “exclusive distributors” of the Shur-Rite.  I believe this was intended to mean in New England only, as advertisements with addresses including other sales offices were published later:


Could Thorp & Martin have glued “Franklin Automatic Pencil” labels over leftover stock of  Shur-Rite leads after the Shur-Rite Pencil Co. disappeared?  Did Thorp & Martin decide to develop their own house brand of pencils, which they chose to name the “Franklin” in honor of their new, prestigious location on Boston’s “stationers’ row?”  I believe they did, and if the evidence presented so far doesn’t convince you, here’s another detail that might help.  It comes from the notice published concerning the death of Thorp & Martin’s president, Richard D. Knight, from the April 15, 1922 edition of The American Stationer:


Mr. Knight, who lived in Providence, Rhode Island, was president of a printing firm, Livermore & Knight, of Providence, in addition to serving as president of Thorp & Martin.  Livermore & Knight’s operations were located at 42 Pine Street, in Providence’s “jewelry district,” a two-minute drive from 14 Imperial Place, Providence:


In 1922, though, it wasn’t called “Imperial Place.”  The street was renamed when city leaders decided that “Blount Street” wasn’t an appropriate name for a street on which a prominent knife manufacturer was located (I guess it sounded too much like “blunt”).  14 Blount Street in Providence was the location of another manufacturer, the one which made the “Franklin” – the Rex Manufacturing Company.