Friday, July 3, 2020

A Tour of the Redipoint Wing

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

A few years ago I put together and presented the twisted story of the “Redipoint” brand (see “The Real Story of Redipoint” at Volume 4, page 335).  I wrote that piece during an all-day seminar I was required to attend as part of my continuing education as a title insurance agent.

Yeah.  Every two years the Department of Insurance requires ten hours of continuing education on a subject that doesn’t have ten hours of material in the entire subject, even after I’ve been doing it for twenty-eight years. 

The instructor, a newly minted, three-year attorney with abysmal speaking skills, apparently hadn’t learned that ten hours of material yet.  I tried to listen, really I did, but I was gradually slipping into a coma with an incredulous look on my face, roused every so often to ask a question that would nudge him into retracting the dumb statement he had just made.  

I’m required to go, I’m not required to listen, and they weren’t paying me to teach the teacher.  After the first break I settled into the back row and opened up my laptop to write a nice historical piece for the blog, using the hotel’s wifi to grab and edit the images I needed.  It was multi-tasking at its finest; the article came out nice, and the Crown deemed me worthy to earn a living as a title agent for another two years.

That’s why “The Real Story of Redipoint” is all clippings and history, without any pretty pictures of the pencils bearing the name.  I've been meaning to shoot some pictures of the entire Redipoint wing of the museum since then, but I’ve never gotten around to doing it – probably because I haven’t had a catalyst arrive to trigger that sort of reaction.

Something . . . like this little booklet, titled “Jot it Down”:


The seller was really paying attention and placed it in the mechanical pencils category.  I never would have seen it otherwise, but when I did I instantly recognized those white and orange circles on a dark background as design elements used during a brief and very interesting chapter in the brand’s history.

The thumbnail version of the story, told in more detail in my previous article, was that the calendar company Brown and Bigelow started making pencils around 1918, but got serious about the pencil business in 1921.  In 1922, William Ingersoll, formerly of the Ingersoll Watch Company which failed in 1921, established the Ingersoll Redipoint Company in New York and took over national sales of the brand under the Ingersoll Redipoint name.

American Writing Instrument Trademarks 1870-1953 contains registration certificates which fit nicely into the story: on April 5, 1922, William H. Ingersoll applied for trademark registration of a handwritten version of his last name, which he claimed to use on pencils since March 24, 1922:


A second application followed on January 11, 1923, for another mark the Ingersoll Redipoint Company, Inc. claimed to use beginning on April 1, 1922.  Herbert H. Bigelow, the president of Brown & Bigelow, appeared to have some continuing involvement after Ingersoll took over production and sales of the Redipoint brand: note that he signed this trademark application as treasurer of Ingersoll Redipoint Company, Inc.


During the time Ingersoll Redipoint was producing pens and pencils, the company’s focus was making quality writing instruments rather than advertising specialties.  However, some tax implications regarding the restructuring must have been overlooked: Herbert Bigelow was convicted of tax evasion in late 1924 and served a prison sentence, which was reduced in light of his good behavior to just a few months - he was released in early 1925.

On February 1, 1926, whether to unwind the transaction or whether William Ingersoll no longer wished to be associated with Bigelow, the Ingersoll Redipoint Company merged back into Brown & Bigelow and returned to St. Paul, Minnesota.  The company continued to offer writing instruments as luxury accessories for a time, but gradually settled back into making pencils and the occasional pen as advertising specialties.

That places items marked with the Ingersoll Redipoint name in that narrow, glorious window of time between 1922 and very early 1926, when the company was working hard to establish itself in the luxury writing instruments market in New York.

My new “Jot it Down” booklet falls within this window.  Inside the front cover is a 1923 calendar, and the first page clarified the title to “Jot It Down with an Ingersoll Pencil,” written in William Ingersoll’s handwritten (Reg. U.S. Pat. Off.) signature:


The book is mostly an address book with a few blank pages, none of which were ever used.  However, it also serves as a handy little almanac with some useful information, including an illustration of how using a Redipoint generates so much less waste than using an ordinary pencil:


Postage rates and the populations of all major U.S. cities:


A Roaring ‘20s chart to calculate stock income, and a handy guide to help you figure out such things as how many quarts there are in a gallon:


Even surveyor’s measuring lengths – now that would have been handy to have in my title insurance seminar, because it’s so much easier to read old legal descriptions in deeds when you know how many inches there are in a link, how many links in a rod and how many rods in a chain:


Should you be poisoned and retain the presence of mind to pull out your notebook, you can consult a list of antidotes:


The page dedicated to business law slips in a subtle hint: “Signatures made with a lead pencil are good in law.” 


On the page opposite where you can keep track of when all your insurance policies expire, the “Ingersoll Simplicity” of only three working parts is illustrated:


The last page provides a rundown and price list of Ingersoll Redipoint’s various models, opposite a 1924 catalog inside the back cover:


This neat little piece of ephemera fit nicely amongst other Redipoint things that found themselves within my “gravitational pull”:  


I say that because with the exception of that glass case, I didn’t find any of these things – they were pulled to me through people who found them and brought them my way.  The glass case came to me in the “Philadelphia hoard” which turned up at the Philly show back in 2015.  It came along with thousands of pencils, and while it wasn’t stocked, these days it’s where I keep my earliest and weirdest Redipoints from before the Ingersoll days, including early repeating pencils, examples of “The Bug,” and my figural examples – that screw figural, if I recall, came to me from Howard Levy:


“Redipoint / For Better Service,” the etched glass top reads, in a font that was found on post-Ingersoll days, dating this to the late 1920s.  Although these pencils aren’t strictly accurate for the case in which they reside, they are the examples of which I am most proud and most enjoy being able to see on display.

Speaking of displays, that store tray was also a nice find:


This tray is from that same Ingersoll Redipoint era as the notebook, from 1922-1926, and the pencils I keep there are from that era, too.  These are the aluminum “Featherweight” and “Checker” pencils referred to in the notebook, for fifty and seventy-five cents respectively.  The “Checker” pencils are the ones equipped for fat “checking” leads - the same .075" leads Autopoint and Eversharp used.

The stand-up wood display of Redipoint pencils came to me through a random email from someone who had one and found me through this blog.  I don’t remember if any of the pencils came with it, but these days I keep Redipoint “Knockabout” silver-plated utility pencils in it, both Ingersoll-era and later Brown and Bigelow examples.  These were listed in the notebook as retailing for 75 cents, but I doubt the smaller ones were priced the same as the larger examples:


With a cameo appearance of the photographer and the wall o’ pencils in the background in the reflection, of course.

I found a great place to keep all of my “Dollar” (rolled silver) and higher-end “Gift” pencils in sterling and gold fill:


This leather salesman’s case is much later, from the 1940s or so, after Brown and Bigelow had reaquired the brand and settled into a business model of producing advertising pencils.  “Redipoint - The Pencil with a Business Building Plan Behind It” is embossed on the front:


This case had a lot of room inside, but I’ve nearly filled it with variations of materials and patterns.  I’d call this “phase two” of getting these organized; much as was the case with my Sheaffers, for years I’ve been diverting pencils along these lines to a box, and I only recently organized them into one place.  Phase 3 of this large project will be grouping and photographing these by imprint (there’s some Ingersoll, some post-Ingersoll in here) and sorting out the model numbers using the price tags:


I have one other nice bit of ephemera which I keep in another area, with all my lead displays.  I pushed the envelope a bit when I set up this display, breaching the agreed-upon boundaries of the collection – while pencils must be confined to one room, the lawyer in me reasoned that store counter lead displays weren’t technically “pencils.”


From what I recall, Martin Ferguson brought this for me to the Raleigh show a few years back.  It was one of those purchases in which he wasn’t taking this bulky thing home with him and I didn’t either, but whatever price we agreed to I’m happy to have it now, since it fits in so well with the Ingersoll-era theme.  It looks like at some point in its long history, a catalog page was taped to the front of it, since you can see the polka-dot theme peeking out from around the edges of it.  I haven’t felt the need to disturb it, although curiosity may well prove too much to prevent me from seeing what’s behind it.

I had aspirations of restocking it with period-correct lead containers, but finding them has been challenging and it didn’t make sense to put them in a display where I couldn’t see them.  The ones I have found have come to live in a cabinet from Jack Price’s old shop in Columbus:


The rest of my Redipoints are grouped into another printer’s cabinet.  The top drawer has the flashier ones:


On the left are mostly Redipoint “Aristocrat” pencils, one of my favorites – big, beautiful and sharing the same trouble-free mechanism of only three working parts.  In the lower row you’ll notice that Redipoint lighter pencil that took me so long to reacquire (see Volume 5, page 181), and that one with the goofy top is the pencil from one of the earliest articles here, “The Tallest Building in Iowa” (Volume 1, page 10).  The left side is all later Brown & Bigelow advertising pencils, also in organization phase 2 at this point.

Finally, there’s a drawer full of other B&B advertisers.  I’d call this organization phase 1 ½.  


The Redipoint, like Autopoints and other pencil-specific “cult” brands, shares the same complex and fascinating history, with so many different variations spread out over four different zones in the museum that it would warrant a book all its own.

Someday, after I’ve finished another long list of projects that have been percolating.  They’ll be here when the time comes.

Thursday, July 2, 2020

Doubly Presitigious

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

I’ve been putting off buying one of these for long enough:


It’s not that I don’t like Eagle (I really, really do) and it’s not that this one isn’t loaded with deco style (it really, really is):


It’s just that these pencils suffer from what I called “Pen to Match Syndrome” in The Catalogue.  These pencils were styled to match the company’s Eagle Prestige pens, unusual paddle-filling pens from the 1930s which are among the most highly prized of Eagle’s products, and among the most expensive to acquire.  David Isaacson took a picture of a few of his Eagle Prestige pens for me to share with you, including one in black to match my pencil:


The pencils, however, lacked any of the technical innovation for which the pens they were made to accompany are so well respected.  Heck, it doesn’t even have a “prestigious” imprint.  Nevertheless, these pencils command prices which are abnormally high for what they are – hence the PMS diagnosis.

I’d seen that black pencil make the rounds on eBay several times over the course of the last year.  Rob Bader had it, priced fairly for those who know what it is.  But to quote Rob, while that is a fair price, I’ve been waiting for one at an unfair price, slipping under the radar as just a plain ol’ Eagle and into a place of honor in my collection.

It hasn’t happened.

I couldn’t put it off any more, because I needed an example so I could show you what a “normal” Eagle Prestige looks like.  When this next one came up online, I thought the seller might have been juicing his description to generate some ill-begotten interest, because it didn’t look anything like any Eagle Prestige I’d seen:


Purists, avert thy eyes.  If ever the occasion called for a bit of china marker to show you what’s going on here, this is it:



Sure enough, “Eagle Prestige” in some really cool script. I decided to phone several thousand friends on this one, so I posted just this picture – no description, no question – in “The Eagle Pencil Company Historical and Collectors Group” on Facebook.  Within moments, Andrew Timar was on it, posting a picture of a “normal” (ish) Eagle Prestige pen:


With a couple of disclaimers . . . first, he said, it wasn’t his pen.  Second, note that the clip does not have an Eagle imprint - Andrew says it was specially branded for the Heacock Deptartment Store in the Philippines.

Matthew Greenberger was right behind him.  The picture Andrew shared was Matthew’s, and he had another one to add:  The celluloid on my pencil doesn’t match those paddle-filler pens I’m so used to seeing, he explained . . . but it does match the lever-filling version.

A lever-filling Eagle Prestige?  Yes, Virginia . . . 


Not only does the celluloid match, but the overall shape of the pen and the twin cap bands make this an exact match.  And the nib . . . 


Well there you go.  And by the way, these are Matthew's pictures used with his blessing.

Since I’m on the subject of Eagle, this group of four showed up online in the weeks since.  They are much later, maybe late 1940s or so:


Neat but kinda cheap looking chrome caps - but you just don’t see these later Eagles very often:


Besides, while those solid barrel examples are a bit ho-hum, the red veined plastic on that top example tied in so well with other Eagles I’ve had:


The middle example is a common configuration, but not usually in that same plastic.  It’s the lower one that is the most familiar in this pattern.  The pens are much more common than the pencils for some reason.  Sometimes the clips are marked “Scout” rather than Eagle, and I’ve squirreled away a few of the pens over the years:


But mine look a bit ratty, as these tend to corrode with their lower quality trim.  Since luck was with me the first time I asked the Eagle elite, I posted this picture in that Eagle group on Facebook again, and once again, Matthew Greenberger didn’t disappoint:


Dang, I was hoping for a little better than mine, not a fully stocked sales card with NOS stickered examples!  Note they were referred to as the “Gold Standard Pens,” and the “OPA ceiling price” (and those round price stickers under the clips) indicate wartime production, when the Office of Price Administration regulated prices of consumer goods to prevent profiteering.  But there’s one other thing on Matthew’s card that made me laugh – the reference to the “Vicehold grip.”  That harkens back to the very early days here at the blog (The Leadhead’s Pencil Blog Vol. 1, page 29) –


The “Vicehold” clip was covered by two patents, according to this reference from the company’s 1937 catalog:



And neither one looks anything like the plain ol’ washer clip Eagle used on its “Gold Standard” pens.  Meh.  Guess they were just trying to add a bit of “prestige” to the line.

Wednesday, July 1, 2020

One Out of Three Is a Perfect Score

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

These are over-the-top steampunk cool, as far as I’m concerned:


I’ve seen a few of these over the years, but I’ve passed on them because they are usually made of thinner metal and they are usually pretty beat up – yet they still run a lot more than I’ve been willing to pay regardless of condition, because of the cool surprise inside.  

The surprise is what happens when you slide that square outer section down towards the tip:


Concealed inside are an ink pad and stamp, which spring into position automatically.  This example is better than most; the metal is thicker, so it’s held up much better than most and has a nice, substantial feel to it.  There’s what looks like a cigar piercer on the top end:


Well, if it isn't a cigar piercer, that would be a good use for it judging from the cut it left on my thumb when I forgot how these dumb things work and pushed down on it!

As you can kind of see in that last picture, there’s quite a bit of patent information . . . and I love me a good patent story:


“Patented / Sep 20 ‘87 - Apr 3 ‘88 / Jan. 15, 1889.”  I opened American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910 to see what these were all about, turned to September 20, 1887, and . . . I listed two patents, one for a pencil sharpener and the other for a stylographic pen.  Nothing that has anything to do with this one . . . swing and a miss, I guess.

On to April 3, 1888 . . . I didn’t list any patents filed on that date.  Strike two.

With an 0-2 count, I turned the page and moved on to  January 15, 1889, hoping I didn’t entirely whiff on this one – and crack! – this one sailed right out of the park:


Edwin Reynolds applied for what would be issued as patent 396,233 on August 29, 1887, for his “rubber stamp” which just happened to be attached to a pencil (and therefore, just happened to be filed in category 401, where most other writing instrument patents are).  The drawings and text don’t say whether that sharp ring on the top is supposed to be a cigar punch, and the text says the pencil “is provided with a removable point-cap, B.”  

Because a non-removable “point-cap” would be terrible.  I kid . . . no, I’m just salty that mine might be missing a cap.  Maybe, maybe not – it certainly wouldn’t have been essential, and I’ve never seen one of these with a cap.

I was also salty that only one of the three patents imprinted on Edwin Reynolds’ pencil was listed in the book.  It’s like Ted Williams said: “Baseball is the only field of endeavor where a man can succeed three times out of ten and be considered a good performer.”  

And this ain’t baseball.

So I went back to retrace my steps.  I wrote American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910 because when all you have to go on is a patent date, without the book you might not find the one you are looking for without reviewing all the patents issued on that date one by one – and there are hundreds that were issued on each day. 

Why bother when you can just do a Google Patent search, you might ask?  Reynolds’ patent right here is the perfect example: the title of the patent is “rubber stamp,” and the metadata preserved by the USPTO (and perpetuated by Google) is . . . drum roll . . . “Title is not available.”  All Google Patents does is make what text there is searchable, and as with all OCR scans, it contains errors.  Even when I search “rubber stamp” “January 15 1889,” I get nothing, and that assumes I could have known the title of the patent was “rubber stamp” when I went looking for it.

Fortunately, Google Patents was helpful once I had both a date and a name – and also fortunately, our man Edwin Reynolds was the same person who took out patents on September 20, 1887, for a rubber stamp having nothing to do with writing instruments:


And on April 3, 1888, for just the top part, which could be mounted on anything . . . even, to carry on the analogy, on the end of a baseball bat:


Both of these patents were filed in category 101, and neither was filed in category 401 for writing instruments.  American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910 was right three times out of three, after all. 

I haven’t found advertisements for Reynolds’ stamping pencil, but that may be from the fact that they’ve been overshadowed by all of the man’s other accomplishments.  This biography of him was published in Modern Machinery in March, 1900:


By the way, I found it interesting that this biography turned up when I searched “Edwin Reynolds stamp,” but there’s no mention of today’s patents in the piece – the stamps referred to were much larger pieces of machinery which “stamped” rocks in order to crush them and extract copper ore.  

He was born in 1831, and after working as a machinist at machine shops in Connecticut and Ohio before becoming the superintendent at Steadman & Co. in Aurora, Indiana, which manufactured engines, sawmills and drainage pumps for Mississippi plantations, an industry which was abruptly halted at the start of the Civil War in 1861.

(Social justice warriors take note: industrialization of the Antebellum South reduced the need for slave labor, so don’t go painting Reynolds in a bad light for that chapter in his career!)

With the decline of Steadman’s fortunes, Reynolds left Indiana and eventually settled in Providence, Rhode Island, which he still claimed as his residence when his stamping pencils were patented in 1889.  However, after the financial panic of 1873, he was sought out by Edward Allis, whose Milwaukee machine shop was bankrupted and reorganized as the Edward P. Allis Company.  Reynolds joined Allis in 1877 and the company became very successful manufacturing steam engines.  Allis died in 1889 and Reynolds assumed control of the company.

In a fateful meeting around 1900, Reynolds met William Chalmers, who ran a local machinery and stamping mill firm (there’s “stamps” again).  You guessed it – the Allis-Chalmers Company was incorporated on March 8, 1901.  For all you city types who have never heard of an Allis-Chalmers tractor, that might not mean much . . . but the move transformed Reynolds from accomplished inventor and businessman to major industrialist.

By 1902, Reynolds’ resume continued to expand even further; he had become president of both the German American Bank and the Milwaukee Boiler Company, in addition to remaining Chief Engineer at Allis-Chalmers.  Presidency of the Edward P. Allis Company had been passed on to Edward Allis’ son William.  Pictures of the two men were prominently featured side by side in Notable Men of Wisconsin in 1902:


On January 16, 1902, Engineering News reported that Edwin Reynolds had been elected President of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.  “Few men, who have attained such eminence in the engineering profession, have risen from humbler beginnings, or have had less to aid in their progress, aside from their own energy and ability, than Mr. Reynolds,” the announcement said.


Edwin Reynolds died after a long illness on February 19, 1909, leaving behind an industrial legacy few others have achieved.  He also left us one unassuming footnote to his career – these odd little stamping pencils – by which I’ll always remember him.


Edwin’s great idea persists to this day, including this recent incarnation: two of his patents were referenced in a patent issued to Herbert Rigoni on September 19, 2000:


That list of patents also includes a patent that predates the Reynolds: an “Emerson” patent issued in January, 1886 as number 334,008.  Out of curiosity, and since I already had the patent number in hand, I had to take a peek:  


Victor H. Emerson’s patent, issued on January 12, 1886, is titled “Hand-Stamp.” However, his drawings clearly shows his invention attached to a writing instrument, so I stepped back up to the plate and checked American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910.  

Yep, it’s in there.  Batted a thousand this time!