Wednesday, July 1, 2020

One Out of Three Is a Perfect Score

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

These are over-the-top steampunk cool, as far as I’m concerned:


I’ve seen a few of these over the years, but I’ve passed on them because they are usually made of thinner metal and they are usually pretty beat up – yet they still run a lot more than I’ve been willing to pay regardless of condition, because of the cool surprise inside.  

The surprise is what happens when you slide that square outer section down towards the tip:


Concealed inside are an ink pad and stamp, which spring into position automatically.  This example is better than most; the metal is thicker, so it’s held up much better than most and has a nice, substantial feel to it.  There’s what looks like a cigar piercer on the top end:


Well, if it isn't a cigar piercer, that would be a good use for it judging from the cut it left on my thumb when I forgot how these dumb things work and pushed down on it!

As you can kind of see in that last picture, there’s quite a bit of patent information . . . and I love me a good patent story:


“Patented / Sep 20 ‘87 - Apr 3 ‘88 / Jan. 15, 1889.”  I opened American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910 to see what these were all about, turned to September 20, 1887, and . . . I listed two patents, one for a pencil sharpener and the other for a stylographic pen.  Nothing that has anything to do with this one . . . swing and a miss, I guess.

On to April 3, 1888 . . . I didn’t list any patents filed on that date.  Strike two.

With an 0-2 count, I turned the page and moved on to  January 15, 1889, hoping I didn’t entirely whiff on this one – and crack! – this one sailed right out of the park:


Edwin Reynolds applied for what would be issued as patent 396,233 on August 29, 1887, for his “rubber stamp” which just happened to be attached to a pencil (and therefore, just happened to be filed in category 401, where most other writing instrument patents are).  The drawings and text don’t say whether that sharp ring on the top is supposed to be a cigar punch, and the text says the pencil “is provided with a removable point-cap, B.”  

Because a non-removable “point-cap” would be terrible.  I kid . . . no, I’m just salty that mine might be missing a cap.  Maybe, maybe not – it certainly wouldn’t have been essential, and I’ve never seen one of these with a cap.

I was also salty that only one of the three patents imprinted on Edwin Reynolds’ pencil was listed in the book.  It’s like Ted Williams said: “Baseball is the only field of endeavor where a man can succeed three times out of ten and be considered a good performer.”  

And this ain’t baseball.

So I went back to retrace my steps.  I wrote American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910 because when all you have to go on is a patent date, without the book you might not find the one you are looking for without reviewing all the patents issued on that date one by one – and there are hundreds that were issued on each day. 

Why bother when you can just do a Google Patent search, you might ask?  Reynolds’ patent right here is the perfect example: the title of the patent is “rubber stamp,” and the metadata preserved by the USPTO (and perpetuated by Google) is . . . drum roll . . . “Title is not available.”  All Google Patents does is make what text there is searchable, and as with all OCR scans, it contains errors.  Even when I search “rubber stamp” “January 15 1889,” I get nothing, and that assumes I could have known the title of the patent was “rubber stamp” when I went looking for it.

Fortunately, Google Patents was helpful once I had both a date and a name – and also fortunately, our man Edwin Reynolds was the same person who took out patents on September 20, 1887, for a rubber stamp having nothing to do with writing instruments:


And on April 3, 1888, for just the top part, which could be mounted on anything . . . even, to carry on the analogy, on the end of a baseball bat:


Both of these patents were filed in category 101, and neither was filed in category 401 for writing instruments.  American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910 was right three times out of three, after all. 

I haven’t found advertisements for Reynolds’ stamping pencil, but that may be from the fact that they’ve been overshadowed by all of the man’s other accomplishments.  This biography of him was published in Modern Machinery in March, 1900:


By the way, I found it interesting that this biography turned up when I searched “Edwin Reynolds stamp,” but there’s no mention of today’s patents in the piece – the stamps referred to were much larger pieces of machinery which “stamped” rocks in order to crush them and extract copper ore.  

He was born in 1831, and after working as a machinist at machine shops in Connecticut and Ohio before becoming the superintendent at Steadman & Co. in Aurora, Indiana, which manufactured engines, sawmills and drainage pumps for Mississippi plantations, an industry which was abruptly halted at the start of the Civil War in 1861.

(Social justice warriors take note: industrialization of the Antebellum South reduced the need for slave labor, so don’t go painting Reynolds in a bad light for that chapter in his career!)

With the decline of Steadman’s fortunes, Reynolds left Indiana and eventually settled in Providence, Rhode Island, which he still claimed as his residence when his stamping pencils were patented in 1889.  However, after the financial panic of 1873, he was sought out by Edward Allis, whose Milwaukee machine shop was bankrupted and reorganized as the Edward P. Allis Company.  Reynolds joined Allis in 1877 and the company became very successful manufacturing steam engines.  Allis died in 1889 and Reynolds assumed control of the company.

In a fateful meeting around 1900, Reynolds met William Chalmers, who ran a local machinery and stamping mill firm (there’s “stamps” again).  You guessed it – the Allis-Chalmers Company was incorporated on March 8, 1901.  For all you city types who have never heard of an Allis-Chalmers tractor, that might not mean much . . . but the move transformed Reynolds from accomplished inventor and businessman to major industrialist.

By 1902, Reynolds’ resume continued to expand even further; he had become president of both the German American Bank and the Milwaukee Boiler Company, in addition to remaining Chief Engineer at Allis-Chalmers.  Presidency of the Edward P. Allis Company had been passed on to Edward Allis’ son William.  Pictures of the two men were prominently featured side by side in Notable Men of Wisconsin in 1902:


On January 16, 1902, Engineering News reported that Edwin Reynolds had been elected President of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.  “Few men, who have attained such eminence in the engineering profession, have risen from humbler beginnings, or have had less to aid in their progress, aside from their own energy and ability, than Mr. Reynolds,” the announcement said.


Edwin Reynolds died after a long illness on February 19, 1909, leaving behind an industrial legacy few others have achieved.  He also left us one unassuming footnote to his career – these odd little stamping pencils – by which I’ll always remember him.


Edwin’s great idea persists to this day, including this recent incarnation: two of his patents were referenced in a patent issued to Herbert Rigoni on September 19, 2000:


That list of patents also includes a patent that predates the Reynolds: an “Emerson” patent issued in January, 1886 as number 334,008.  Out of curiosity, and since I already had the patent number in hand, I had to take a peek:  


Victor H. Emerson’s patent, issued on January 12, 1886, is titled “Hand-Stamp.” However, his drawings clearly shows his invention attached to a writing instrument, so I stepped back up to the plate and checked American Writing Instrument Patents 1799-1910.  

Yep, it’s in there.  Batted a thousand this time!

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Loose Change from the Dollar Line

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

(Originally scheduled to post May 16, 2018) 

I’ve had some pictures in the archive of some details to add regarding Conklin’s “dollar pencils,” starting with this bunch, which came my way by David Nishimura so many years ago that these pictures were taken on the old camera.  Now that I’ve gotten better at photo editing, the images are presentable:


There’s new old stock, there’s mint . . . and then there’s time machines that catapult you back to a stationer’s counter nearly a century ago:


The tissue paper wrappings, with purple stars, are cinched closed with stickers indicating what model pencil is wrapped inside:


A couple of the tissue wrappings were damaged, so I slipped the pencils inside from their coverings for this shot:


The short model with Conklin’s lower-level clip (see The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Vol. 2, page 25) - designated Model #0SC - is a real prize.  Note also the fingerprint of someone who handled the pencil a century ago on the ringtop:


In fact, in that earlier article I posted, both of these pencils show up in the image I included from Conklin’s 1922 catalog:


I also have a couple details to report on Conklin’s 1925 dollar pencils (see "A Fist Full of Dollar Pencils").  First, there were two blues - one more teal, and the other a brighter robin’s egg blue:


And, in addition to the black, orange/red and blue shown in the 1925 catalog, they are also found in dark green:


Since green is not shown in the 1925 catalog, but is shown in the 1930-1931 catalog for that other line of dollar pencils . . . 


. . .  I’m inclined to think green was added later in the line, and if true, that might indicate that the shorter caps I’ve noted here before are later production:


Speaking of those 1930-1931 dollar pencils, I’ve managed to find examples in black and red:


Half of a red one, anyway . . . the material is very brittle and my example has a gaping crack next to the clip.  In the years since these pictures were taken, I still haven’t turned up a better example.  Or a green one.

Monday, June 29, 2020

Panda Craps

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

(Originally scheduled to post May 15, 2018) 

Several years ago at the Springfield Extravaganza I found a boxed Dur-O-Lite, identified by a model name I hadn’t known of before:


The “7-11" pencil is a thin model with a deco-style clip, equipped with the same removable-nose mechanism the company had used since its formation in 1926, a vestige from its roots in Autopoint.


“7-11" refers to a “natural” roll of the dice in craps - an automatic winning roll of either a 7 or an 11.


Then along came the Panda Pencil Company, whose assets I purchased in 2014 when they sold their building.  Panda Pencil was a subsidiary of Dur-O-Lite, a fact the company kept a closely guarded secret while quietly supplying lead to many of Dur-O-Lite’s competitors, including without limitation Autopoint, Eversharp, Parker, Sheaffer and (possibly) Eberhard Faber.  

Along with millions of sticks of lead were a few other odds and ends, including a few pencils.  Some of them added a bit more to the 7-11 pencil story:


“Make a Game of Selling More in ‘64 / Give New 7-11 Pencils By Dur-O-Lite” these samples read, along with the dice motif on the tops:


The company had a great sense of humor.  These were also in Panda’s archives:


“Now More Than Ever People Appreciate Dur-O-Lite . . . The No. 1 Pencil” and “Confidentially, Haven’t You Hade Enough Cheap Ball Pens?” 


Now more than ever was 1972, the occasion of the company’s 46th Anniversary - in case you were wondering how I’ve known the company was formed in 1926 for all these years.  The ferrule on that one shows a Dur-O-Lite magnet attracting customers:



On the other is a somewhat creepy dude, encouraging you to “face” the fact that ball pens were going the way of the dodo:



Sunday, June 28, 2020

The Other Beegee

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.


(Originally scheduled to post May 14, 2018) 

It’s been years since I’ve thought about the Beegee line of budget leadholders (see The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Vol. 1, page 413).  I don’t know why I never posted about this find, from the Philadelphia Show that year:


With the box and paperwork, the “Beegee Perfect Ink Eraser” deserves a mention:



The “eraser” is actually a fiberglass brush, concealed within the nose cone - exposing just a tiny bit would create a very stiff abrasive surface to buff ink from the page.   Although it was marketed as an ink eraser, it works equally for scuffing pencil marks away, too:




The cap is marked “Beegee Jr. / Pat. Oct. 17, 1911:


Francis Henry Baldwin and William Graff of New York applied for this patent on June 30, 1910, and it was issued as number 1,005,924:


And yes Virginia, the patent is listed in American Writing Instrument Patents Volume 2: 1911-1945.

Saturday, June 27, 2020

An Interesting Connection

This article has been edited and included in The Leadhead's Pencil Blog Volume 6, now on sale at The Legendary Lead Company.  I have just a few hard copies left of the first printing, available here, and an ebook version in pdf format is available for download here.

If you don't want the book but you enjoy this article, please consider supporting the Blog project here.

(Originally scheduled to post May 13, 2018) 

There were two reasons I didn’t publish these photographs after I took them four years ago or so:


The first was that I had already used pictures of the top one in an article I wrote establishing that the “Sterling.A.” mark was in fact an Aikin Lambert mark, since it bears both marks:


The other reason was that I couldn’t explain the imprints on the other one.  It looks like a German pencil, with that black nose, but the top imprint is also Aikin Lambert:


The other imprint, however, puzzled me:


“L. & C. Hardtmuth’s / Kohinoor.”   There are eight versions of the Koh-I-Noor trademark listed in American Writing Instrument Trademarks 1870-1953; the German firm first claimed to use the mark with respect to pencils, in 1890.


It seems an unlikely collaboration, but we know from the ALCo hallmark that the pencil was made after 1908, after Aikin Lambert had been absorbed by L.E. Waterman in 1907 (see David Nishimura’s article on the subject posted at "Waterman and Aikin Lambert").  And who was the distributor for Waterman’s pens outside of North and South America?  


L. & C. Hardtmuth.  The relationship ended by necessity with the outbreak of World War I in 1914, and apparently it went both ways: Hardtmuth distributed Waterman pens overseas, while Aikin Lambert – Waterman’s subsidiary – distributed Hardtmuth’s Koh-I-Noor products, including pencils . . . 


. . . and lead refills, as indicated by this wire lead gauge owned by Joe Nemecek.