tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066831911322883231.post7847283611780535698..comments2024-03-24T18:57:45.174-07:00Comments on The Leadhead's Pencil Blog: Then Along Came the BallpointUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066831911322883231.post-12698954814837516902020-07-12T03:41:30.194-07:002020-07-12T03:41:30.194-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.David Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15935109658694151847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066831911322883231.post-32406616814009722922016-01-10T18:50:02.157-08:002016-01-10T18:50:02.157-08:00You are correct on the viscosity issue . . . thinn...You are correct on the viscosity issue . . . thinner is less viscous, not more. Correction made with my thanks.Jon Veleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16324280175564551826noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066831911322883231.post-45014040696870450642016-01-10T06:17:25.956-08:002016-01-10T06:17:25.956-08:00Jon,
In your post you wrote ".. which did no...Jon,<br /><br />In your post you wrote ".. which did not rely on the patented capillary action, but rather used gravity alone and a thinner, more viscous ink." Did you mean less viscous ink?qvxbnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066831911322883231.post-79463210055767854242016-01-08T10:21:19.261-08:002016-01-08T10:21:19.261-08:00Great research, work & insight Jon. In terms ...Great research, work & insight Jon. In terms of learning more, that makes at least two of us {hah}. Keep up the excavation and revelations!<br /><br />Cheers, JonAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08431936102243417113noreply@blogger.com